inventor 2013 e dwg

[Esselle]

see what happens by autocading a dwg generated starting from an idw file (2013) and saved as a copy with name in dwg (2013).

I also tried to make a dxf but I get the same result.

the edges of the dice in side view (it does not happen on those seen in front) go crazy.

Does it happen to anyone else?

Thank you!

 

[GiGa]

I've got it. I have not yet tried though if the update 1 has corrected the problem.. .

 

[Esselle]

to me the update 1 did not correct it, unfortunately.. .

 

[stefanobruno]

the passage from idw to dwg I find it really painful (I am using 2011 ), all the times that I deliver the dwg my customers are found with odds out of place, fonts at home, carts with writings out of field.
a ball, and say I've lost time to hit conversions.
I still haven't mounted the 2013 I hoped it was a little better but I see they managed to make things worse.

 

[luigix]

try to open the file with solidworks...... then you climb it up like dwg....to me repair them!!! !

 

[stefanobruno]

try to open the file with solidworks...... then you climb it up like dwg....to me repair them!!! !

No! ! ! ! ! ! !
are more careful the sw programmers on a competitor product of the progr. natives, I go in a corner and :36_1_4:
but one day :36_6_10: it will come and then we will also do :4406: of joy, ....... sperem.

ps. : I do not know if I should buy sw to solve conversion problems, I have some doubts.

 

[marcof]

try to open the file with solidworks...... then you climb it up like dwg....to me repair them!!! !

use swx as a converter of formats from "dwg kissed" to "dwg good" seems to me to be a discreetly expensive solution, but in lack of better.. .
[mode bastard ON]I remember the insistence of an inventor who wanted to sell it, insisting on compatibility with the dwg and therefore with the historian "see, autocad and inventor are of the same house so compatibility is assured and recovery of the historian can happen without problems"
Rotfl me![mode bastard OFF]:smile:

 

[stefanobruno]

.... the recovery of the historian can take place without problems"

I use inv. for 10 years, I never " recovered " a historical dwg ", always remodeled.
what it means "to recover the historian ", is the same as having an archive in pdf.
I think, however, that even with sw, you can get a table set, obtaining a file that can be used as a native.

 

[tir]

see what happens by autocading a dwg generated starting from an idw file (2013) and saved as a copy with name in dwg (2013).

2013 no more exporting from inventor, import files directly into autocad

 

[Esselle]

Thanks for the interesting report. It just works that it doesn't matter the bolts I don't know if I have to do some special procedure or it's so...

 

[marcof]

"...the recovery of the historian can take place without problems"

I use inv. for 10 years, I never " recovered " a historical dwg ", always remodeled.

even I, in 11 years of use of swx, have never used a two-dimensional file of the historian

what it means "to recover the historian ", is the same as having an archive in pdf.

and you ask me:tongue:? I have quoted the panzane of the inventor's commercial, to which I objected that he was saying of the notes of the cows, and the historian in 2d is not in fact recoverable to create 3d parametric files.

I think, however, that even with sw, you can get a table set, obtaining a file that can be used as a native.

I must have written clearly in the other post.
I thought it was understood that I was ironicing about the paradoxical situation that inventor casts out the export of a dwg. compatibility with autocad was one of the battle horses of the autodesk commercials when, late compared to the competition, they began to launch and push inventor not to lose the mcad3d market train.
the fact that the solution to the problem of the discussion is to import the dwg created by inventor into solidworks and to reexport it then for autocad was too strong temptation to not put in [mode bastard ON]far from me the idea to unleash flame for these baggianates, eh!

 

[kimal]

try to open the file with solidworks...... then you climb it up like dwg....to me repair them!!! !

but sorry, is it normal that one who pays a 10,000 euro software then should, as only possibility, reopen it from sw?
the question can also be asked in these terms: But if I've already spent a big bed for solidworks, what should I do with inventor since he has all these problems?

 

[Tarkus]

but sorry, is it normal that one who pays a 10,000 euro software then should, as only possibility, reopen it from sw?
the question can also be asked in these terms: But if I've already spent a big bed for solidworks, what should I do with inventor since he has all these problems?

I don't know, you tell us, that you've already paid a lot of money for both solidworks, both for inventor and also for 3dstudiomax to what you see in your profile.
tell us even if you saw that as the first post it would be better to show up in the appropriate section. . .

 

[kimal]

I don't know, you tell us, that you've already paid a lot of money for both solidworks, both for inventor and also for 3dstudiomax to what you see in your profile.
tell us even if you saw that as the first post it would be better to show up in the appropriate section. . .

for the presentation I apologize and I do it right away.

for the software I wrote. the fact that I use them at work doesn't necessarily mean that I must have bought them personally for greater reason if I tell you that I have been addicted for several years. so before leaving with so much language, as I have read very often on this forum, go calm.:smile:

 

[GiGa]

I thought the problem was only with the arches of the side views of nuts and screws of the c.c. (at least so I had always happened).
Actually today I found that by getting a dwg from a solidwork modeled set and then imported into inventor, he made me the same joke on the arches of the hexagon embedded in the side view of a flared head screw... always viteria but, of course, certainly not from c.c. of inventor.
Perhaps, the fact that you understand with the vines is a coincidence... probably the problem arises from the type of arc designed.

 

[Tarkus]

for the presentation I apologize and I do it right away.

for the software I wrote. the fact that I use them at work doesn't necessarily mean that I must have bought them personally for greater reason if I tell you that I have been addicted for several years. so before leaving with so much language, as I have read very often on this forum, go calm.:smile:

I like the first part of the answer, on the second I see you rather susceptible...and however since it's a piece you see as a "shower" this forum, you will have understood that the "language" I also try to use it for constructive discussions..as I hope you will also do.
I welcome you on the forum:smile:

 

[cacciatorino]

but sorry, is it normal that one who pays a 10,000 euro software then should, as only possibility, reopen it from sw?

10,000 even, we do not exaggerate...