lamp holder modeling

[elleci]

Hello everyone,
as from title they are struggling with the sw modeling of a support for a work lamp.
As for modeling with simple extrusion functions I have had no particular difficulties, so I propose the file to have your opinion.

the question that I now ask myself is: observing that piece (considering that it can be destined for a production in series) is possible that it is realized starting from a sheet? I tried to model it using the function sw sheet but I lock myself when I have to make the two side flanges and I also have difficulty to realize that cylinder cable as a single base flange (from the well understood file that I have two pieces actually separated).
Surely the solution will be quite simple but I can't come to the end.. .
I put the file I'm working on here.

do you have any suggestions / advice to give me?


p.s. I did the tutorials of sw and bed sheet in the help the ability to merge the solids but so doing then I have problems in extending the obtained solid

 

[SHIREN]

Hello everyone,
as from title they are struggling with the sw modeling of a support for a work lamp.
As for modeling with simple extrusion functions I have had no particular difficulties, so I propose the file to have your opinion.

the question that I now ask myself is: observing that piece (considering that it can be destined for a production in series) is possible that it is realized starting from a sheet? I tried to model it using the function sw sheet but I lock myself when I have to make the two side flanges and I also have difficulty to realize that cylinder cable as a single base flange (from the well understood file that I have two pieces actually separated).
Surely the solution will be quite simple but I can't come to the end.. .
I put the file I'm working on here.

do you have any suggestions / advice to give me?


p.s. I did the tutorials of sw and bed sheet in the help the ability to merge the solids but so doing then I have problems in extending the obtained solid

[MENTION=67323]elleci[/MENTION]you can also attach jpeg
or jges file or step
Thank you very much

 

[elleci]

[MENTION=312]threshing[/MENTION]Here are the files you asked me, basically if you look at the screenshot of the shaped file as a sheet, I have two separate entities and I was wondering if there is a way to join them in a single sheet (without resorting to welding, in fact I don't think it is done so)...or do I have to review all the modeling? Do you have any suggestions?
Thank you for your help

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the fact is that it does not seem to be developed by a single sheet.
I remade it, with magheggi, that in two bodies turning it into a single sheet and it gives me error.
the question to ask is: in reality that type of bending can you do?
I'll attach you two versions of my file. in both not mind the error of the function that is due to the fact that the folds are surmounted and solid perceives it, rightly, as error
I made two of them to point out how with the same function but managing it in order to obtain a bent body differently you have in one case error and in the other no. and therefore the question arises can be done in reality?
I still put my hands on and say that (edit: deleted a non too much) I use very ground sheet functions and therefore it is not excluded that it is possible to obtain the result with functions that do not require the furbates that I have done and that preclude perhaps the result
said this here are the two files and previewView attachment lamiera con alette.zip

 

[ceschi1959]

According to me it is possible with the cad with the sheet commands, so you can get developments and other, always that the software allows it******, while it is not possible to die-fold as the open part you can do with an ad hoc punch while the 'closed' part you have to realize it thinking of putting a tube in between and piagare the underframe part.
I hope I explained.
* [Bleep] the sx image placed by massivonweizen shows you how a cad can not distinguish the fold in part at 180° and partly at about 360°.
You could try to do it 'in together' like two separate pieces.
Hi.

 

[elleci]

[MENTION=16601]mammals[/MENTION]Thank you very much for the help, I will try to think about what you told me and the files you sent me. indeed my main doubt concerns the actual feasibility of bending.

[MENTION=237]baskets1959[/MENTION]I had "imagined" the process like this:
1) the 'closed' part is made by guiding the sheet around a cylinder (I believe that you also mean this);
2) the upper part with the fins is obtained by bending the sheet around a cylinder of appropriate size, even if reading your message I have to believe

I attach the image of the real piece (which I have not available, I found it on the internet), from here I think it is clearly seen that it is a unique piece

 

[SHIREN]

the question to ask is: in reality that type of bending can you do?
View attachment 47374View attachment 47373

Hello Masses.... .

perhaps in multiple stages
and it seems to me that the real solution
Thank you very much

 

[elleci]

Hello everyone again, thinking about the file shared by [MENTION=16601]mammals[/MENTION] (and after [MENTION=312]threshing[/MENTION] he said that the thing was feasible :biggrinI managed to "add" the problems that sw posed in modeling.
This is what came out, it seems good to me... what do you think?

 

[ceschi1959]

I had "imagined" the process like this:
1) the 'closed' part is made by guiding the sheet around a cylinder (I believe that you also mean this);
2) the upper part with the fins is obtained by bending the sheet around a cylinder of appropriate size, even if reading your message I have to believe

I attach the image of the real piece (which I have not available, I found it on the internet), from here I think it is clearly seen that it is a unique piece

I think it's the process with a very simple step mold.
from the cad point of view with massive sw and shiren did the rest.

 

[SHIREN]

I think it's the process with a very simple step mold.
from the cad point of view with massive sw and shiren did the rest.

hello to all
if we reason with the head of business
once made the investment of a sw
in practice we solved all the probes of the world
but also the sw of those who have "hard" have limits
limits that must be circumvented with a very economic sw
available active more or less h24 with a simple inclusive interface
with some variant of a pair of glasses maybe a beard and mustache
and nu mozzicone and cigarette for those who still has bad habit of smoking
"ahhhh goat"
Thank you very much