loft with cross circles

[Oldwarper]

Nice...good...compliments....
What did you do? A fried dumpling?

Now we're clear.

You can't expect others to understand in 4-word-4 what you need and then inhale yourself if you didn't understand "on the fly. At least we can afford to imperfect ourselves if those who tried to understand in the absence or lack of precise info then, I realize that I lost time, it slips, considering that everything is done free of charge and without obligation.

So, if someone with "a little bit more experience" (and look at that I don't talk about postcounts on the forum, but of fact, that maybe you don't have much clarity, not having read the forum thoroughly) you "apostrofa", maybe in a somewhat colorful way, you cash in and you pass to something else.

not to mention presumption, but to respect against those who, with an experience and a "service entity" that puts you at your disposal, I repeat, without asking for anything in return, then you incaxxa seeing continuously (and you are not the only responsible, maybe only one of the many victims) characters who come with absurd problems or explained to the "one so much to the kg", whose necessary information must be extorted with

So, if you want to get some results, I think you have to endure this old bunch of brontoloni, or there is always an efficient helpdesk of swx ready to solve all your problems (before, it goes to the box).

with affection.

 

[xxfast]

obviously you do not know solidworks



idem as above, before expressing opinions you should know the subject of which you speak.

having solidworks you do not need rhino or autocad to pull out these geometries.

I had recommended autocad from 2010 on, because there is the possibility to convert the solid into mesh. As I think it is a modeling work, especially from an aesthetic point of view, then I thought that in doing so it could be modeled more freely the parts.
:4445:

 

[maxopus]

I had recommended autocad from 2010 on, because there is the possibility to convert the solid into mesh. As I think it is a modeling work, especially from an aesthetic point of view, then I thought that in doing so it could be modeled more freely the parts.
:4445:

What does solid conversion have to do with mesh?
he starts from 3 curves and gets some surfaces.
autocad conversions then I recommend them, I tried to export a cone to iges and exported half.

 

[xxfast]

bhe was so to say.
then everyone works with the means they can use. . .

 

[TOMATO]

Well, then now I'm clear:"I never...and I never say...sorry any "fast response", I've never been "extorted info with force" and not "behind begging".
then so much to be precise it is not a question, as someone supperficially insinuated of "coupling" seen and considered that I talked about achieving that effect...not sure to make a lamp or similar, it is only a starting point to do what I need. and I do not say this because I feel the need to justify myself, since my creativity is not questioned. and then who can say that this lamp is the first creation in the genre. as it was said reminds a lot of the oriental style.
said this:" yes!!!! designers care whether what they produce is or not feasible because, very simply, if they don't sell they don't eat and then why it would be less the sense of their work...and I assure you that it is good that what I work for is feasible and I will tell you more, it is much easier to realize it than to build it in slw.......at least for those who like me does not "have the foundations". on the other hand I have a lot of good will.
this to answer the gentlemen marcof and oldwarper, sure to have been clear and not offensive.
the problem if of problem you want to talk, is that I started my adventure in the world of 3d with 4d cinema that while being a beautiful program is not parametric as it is slw so I don't need for practical purposes. I don't know rhino but from what I am (please no one offends) it's not even parametric this program. Unfortunately, I don't even know autocad and I just saw the mesh argument that sounds so tough. I cannot use the revolution because it is a symmetrical object.
but I do not want to extend beyond, thank you so that all those who wanted to participate in this discussion and those who gave me very useful suggestions.

 

[re_solidworks]

now that you have clarified all of us can return to a peaceful and quiet tone? without saying yes, but he.... .

Come on!

 

[re_solidworks]

obviously you do not know solidworks



idem as above, before expressing opinions you should know the subject of which you speak.

having solidworks you do not need rhino or autocad to pull out these geometries.

said by him... Is that him? ? no must be the brother who screwed him id and pwd...

I go out and look what time ago....

 

[maxopus]

said by him... Is that him? ? no must be the brother who screwed him id and pwd...

I go out and look what time ago....

by not doing so:smile:
at the bottom (but very deep) I love you of solid works. :biggrin: