long curve repeat to get ring belt

[MassiVonWeizen]

I extrude a tooth and problems begin when I repeat along the curve.

you dare to repeat the inclusive tooth of band.
you must shape the band for its own facts and extrude, then repeat, the only shaped tooth

 

[Stefano_GS]

you dare to repeat the inclusive tooth of band.
you must shape the band for its own facts and extrude, then repeat, the only shaped tooth

I don't think I understand what you mean.
I try to bring back an image to explain my reasoning.I considered the section below the neutra line (which also determines the belt/chain function).
apart from then I would model the body section that will have as an internal contour the sketch of the belt function and as an external contour its offset, this to solve at least graphically the problem of polygonization (in my file such function is present but disabled because of the problem that I mark in the repetition along the curve)

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

Thank you very much, in general very useful command of which I completely ignored existence.
However, I just can't make it work with my proof.
Any ideas? Here is the file con link esterno

 

[Stefano_GS]

Thanks again, now it works.

 

[Stefano_GS]

you dare to repeat the inclusive tooth of band.
you must shape the band for its own facts and extrude, then repeat, the only shaped tooth

I reread the command guide and solved by changing the offset curve method, now I can repeat the function (in this way on the straight stroke the body is unique).
I also realized that the small pulley has a degree of freedom too that however I struggle to settle because if I use coupling of an additional plane then does not rotate correctly and if I use coupling distance compared to other pulley then does not work the belt length (which acts on that distance). Even if I have to say I'm fused today and maybe I'm messing up.

I bring this video tutorial: link youtubeI tried to use the couplings path and gear but obviously I'm wrong something because nothing works for me.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Have you seen my attachment with couplings and handling?

 

[Stefano_GS]

Have you seen my attachment with couplings and handling?

Yes, that kind of handling I get it, too.
in the video that I also attach the wheel strap solidarity with the gears. but he model the tooth of the belt using the vacuum of the teeth of the pulley as sketch and gets edges and perfectly coincident points (hypotizzo could be one of the rocks to bypass if model ingraining with game, actually in my model I interference but there must be some mistake)
I have the problem for now on the pulley grid but I fear that if I want to impose the belt length I have to settle. at practical level I could set the belt length, then turn it off and add the bond to the pulley so it does not move anymore.thanks so much to you for continuous support and ideas of reflection

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

but you have to print the strap in 3d? or do you need precision for specific analysis?

 

[Stefano_GS]

in reality neither one nor the other.
in case of analysis we had previously relied on an external supplier who had digested the straight profile.
these days I was at home with a few extra hours to spend, and sometimes it would have been useful especially for some presentation to have a better transmission even if well animated to use. Another aspect that I would like to migrate to the 3d is the demonstration of the different type of ingration between the various profiles, but perhaps it is easier to operate with straight development (as if it were a fastening plate and the belt).
In summary it is a question of deepening my knowledge and of having material for didactic/demonstrative purposes

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

After a billion words I managed.
I'll help you with your studies, then if you need some explanation, ask yourself.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

pay attention to wheel constraints

 

[Stefano_GS]

Hello Masses,
I didn't mean to make you say bad words.... but to me asm2 despite the constraints on the path continues to rotate only the gears with the belt tooth that remains firm, I do not know if it can depend on the fact that I open it with 2016

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

cannot depend on the version.
I opened the attachment is not the working one. has pack &gotatto a previous phase.
I'll see what I did later.

You didn't provoke the scumbags, but the crucco?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Let's try again.
the movement is there, the tooth does what it wants, but made with 2014 maybe those constraints were not yet optimized. as you see I suspended the mating on the place that is added to the creation of the tooth.

 

[Stefano_GS]

Let's try again.
the movement is there, the tooth does what it wants, but made with 2014 maybe those constraints were not yet optimized. as you see I suspended the mating on the place that is added to the creation of the tooth.

Also with 2016 does the same thing, even on my file, at this point I hypothesize is a phenomenon related to the transmission ratio (the next week I try a transmission ratio 1:1 and to set of coupling the exact number of teeth of the pulley).
on my file I then have the problem that when I activate the linear repetition the points taken for coupling along the path no longer exist (I don't have the separate teeth as in your example) and goes all to p_____e... .
Next week I'm messed up, but I'll try a little bit more to cuff.

 

[Stefano_GS]

in the short time I found I came to a partially positive result._ I would say, the tooth follows the curve and rotation of the pulleytogether statically everything is ok, strap and pulleys gear properly with the correct tangences but if active the correct couplings of paths and gear then everything goes to be blessed if I activate the repetition along the tooth curve because the points I have taken to reference disappear by joining the repetition the bodies.
I'm confident that by tapping a little bit of finding a solution