nicola1985
Guest
where can I buy one of these materials?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Il marangon
Guest
mdf.. from any carpenter
epowood or ureol or purbloc depending on the manufacturer changes the name but the material is more or less always that (pockets of polyurethane resin loaded with thickeners and the like) from a modeler, I don't think you sell a single table from the manufacturers that I have indicated to you
epowood or ureol or purbloc depending on the manufacturer changes the name but the material is more or less always that (pockets of polyurethane resin loaded with thickeners and the like) from a modeler, I don't think you sell a single table from the manufacturers that I have indicated to you
nicola1985
Guest
do you know if there is a solidworks plug-in to simulate the tool path?
the output provided by one of these programs is good for every tool machine?
I found the material... I made a normal polystyrene core coated with resin and then the frieze.
if you like it I will take you from the processing to the final test of impact!
the output provided by one of these programs is good for every tool machine?
I found the material... I made a normal polystyrene core coated with resin and then the frieze.
if you like it I will take you from the processing to the final test of impact!
nicola1985
Guest
I forgot if possible free...
Il marangon
Guest
simulate or create?
the very different thing. .
but let me guess, would you give your miller the tool path? If yes, I tell you immediately let it go, there are too many variables at stake and the risk of collision is too high.
I give you an example, you create a roughing with a cut of 20 but the miller sharpened it and the cutter is now from 19.6, you have to remake the route... think about this for a 5-6 different tools. . .
the output that these programs provide can, but it is not said, go well for several machines but you must have the so-called post-processor (the program that "translates" in machine language what you see to video) for each machine and however cutting parameters, advances, releases etc. often change from machine to machine
that I know cam free there are no...
the very different thing. .
but let me guess, would you give your miller the tool path? If yes, I tell you immediately let it go, there are too many variables at stake and the risk of collision is too high.
I give you an example, you create a roughing with a cut of 20 but the miller sharpened it and the cutter is now from 19.6, you have to remake the route... think about this for a 5-6 different tools. . .
the output that these programs provide can, but it is not said, go well for several machines but you must have the so-called post-processor (the program that "translates" in machine language what you see to video) for each machine and however cutting parameters, advances, releases etc. often change from machine to machine
that I know cam free there are no...
nicola1985
Guest
Got it. .simulate or create?
the very different thing. .
but let me guess, would you give your miller the tool path? If yes, I tell you immediately let it go, there are too many variables at stake and the risk of collision is too high.
I give you an example, you create a roughing with a cut of 20 but the miller sharpened it and the cutter is now from 19.6, you have to remake the route... think about this for a 5-6 different tools. . .
the output that these programs provide can, but it is not said, go well for several machines but you must have the so-called post-processor (the program that "translates" in machine language what you see to video) for each machine and however cutting parameters, advances, releases etc. often change from machine to machine
that I know cam free there are no...
Thank you!