make the most obvious points in the printing phase

[dottjeky]

Good morning.
I ask for your help with the autocad point object printing.
I deal with topographic reliefs, and my elaborates are composed of lines, polylines, restraints etc... and points, which I change there through the command "stile point" to which I assign a symbol (classic crucade) and a dimension.
the points are in a specific layer to which I assign a color and thickness, but in the press the symbol is seen little and I need the crucible to be seen more clearly.
I did various tests, increasing the line thickness, changing the thickness of the point...but I did not find solution.

 

[Tristan]

use blocks instead of points

 

[rpor66]

I have the impression that you haven't made the right attempts.
the point entity is treated as all other entities, so, if you check a color, we put the 5, in the printing stage set in the ctb file color 5 with thickness equal to 0.6, the result will be a marked point.

 

[dottjeky]

You're right this solution didn't prove it, and it works.
But if I change the line thickness in the ctb, all the objects of that color will have the same thickness, instead I care that every object has its thickness even if the color is the same, and that imposed it through the layers.
I don't understand why all objects acquire the thickness from the layer except the points.
thanks for the help

 

[Cristallo]

You're right this solution didn't prove it, and it works.
But if I change the line thickness in the ctb, all the objects of that color will have the same thickness, instead I care that every object has its thickness even if the color is the same, and that imposed it through the layers.
I don't understand why all objects acquire the thickness from the layer except the points.
thanks for the help

I do not understand why it should be the point entity to take the thickness of the layer and not use a color (so print thickness) appropriate.
no one prohibits color 5 in the ctb thickness 0.6 and also has color 235 (I say one randomly)
more than color-ctb assignment replaces layer thickness when assigned in print.

 

[dottjeky]

I do not understand why it should be the point entity to take the thickness of the layer and not use a color (so print thickness) appropriate.
no one prohibits color 5 in the ctb thickness 0.6 and also has color 235 (I say one randomly)
more than color-ctb assignment replaces layer thickness when assigned in print.

should be the point entity to take the thickness from the layer, because color 5 I can use it for the points but also for other entities (lines, polylines, restraints etc...) of design, and for this to me it interests that in the ctb the thickness of the color use the thickness line object.
I make an example: relief of a road. in my file I will have the following layers:1 dots_carrier_road, 2 drawing_street, 3quota...etc all the layers of the roadside will have the same color however different thickness, as if imposed the thickness in the ctb is not said to be good for points and drawing.

 

[Cristallo]

I don't understand. you want entities that have a certain color, but different thicknesses?

But if I change the line thickness in the ctb, all the objects of that color will have the same thickness, instead I care that every object has its thickness even if the color is the same, and that imposed it through the layers.

You can't! when you print, or print layer or color thicknesses!
useless put the thickness to a layer and then print with the ctb. You only see it on video.
but how do you draw?
Draw a thickness to a layer and then use the colors to distinguish what? a linden is a linden. that it is red or green, you see it different only to video if it takes the thickness of the layer in the printing phase.

 

[Tristan]

I make an example: relief of a road. in my file I will have the following layers:1 dots_carrier_road, 2 drawing_street, 3quota...etc all the layers of the roadside will have the same color however different thickness, as if imposed the thickness in the ctb is not said to be good for points and drawing.

I'm sorry, but... you don't think you'd like to use stb instead of ctb?