sway_89
Guest
Hello, I'm new, I just signed up.
I have changed work and industry and in the new company where I am making the transition from 2d to 3d, we have solidworks 2016 professional + pdm 2016 .
the problem that we encounter is in the realization and management from the graphic point of view and of code of the seals or any other mechanical part that goes in separate but is not quantified in number but in meters.
I make an example to clarify.
I have a pdm code that identifies me a 20x5 seal glueable on one side(the classic sponge seal that glues on one side) now the problem I encounter is that they want to draw on each machine the seals, so each machine will have its own gasket meters.
in this way the original code of the seal is no longer usable because if I go to change the modification of one all the machines where mounted, and in addition they would want it to go separately with the calculation of the meters mounted on that machine (this option can also be handled manually).
in my previous experience we made a code "neutro" for the name of the part and we drew our seal and inside the properties of the part this code takes behind the original code of the seal to which it referred and then we also made the table.
They do not want to adopt this procedure because they do not want to multiply the tables and do not want to adopt a neutral code for management.
Is there anyone who can help me?
thanks to all and good day.
I have changed work and industry and in the new company where I am making the transition from 2d to 3d, we have solidworks 2016 professional + pdm 2016 .
the problem that we encounter is in the realization and management from the graphic point of view and of code of the seals or any other mechanical part that goes in separate but is not quantified in number but in meters.
I make an example to clarify.
I have a pdm code that identifies me a 20x5 seal glueable on one side(the classic sponge seal that glues on one side) now the problem I encounter is that they want to draw on each machine the seals, so each machine will have its own gasket meters.
in this way the original code of the seal is no longer usable because if I go to change the modification of one all the machines where mounted, and in addition they would want it to go separately with the calculation of the meters mounted on that machine (this option can also be handled manually).
in my previous experience we made a code "neutro" for the name of the part and we drew our seal and inside the properties of the part this code takes behind the original code of the seal to which it referred and then we also made the table.
They do not want to adopt this procedure because they do not want to multiply the tables and do not want to adopt a neutral code for management.
Is there anyone who can help me?
thanks to all and good day.