management of quota tolerances in autocad lt

[Roberto Michelizza]

Good morning, everyone.
I have a little problem with autocad lt.
I operate with mechanical autocad and when I go to make double clik on a quota opens the mask in which I can indicate the type of tolerance (h7;g6; etc.,etc) or attribute the field of tolerance (eg: +0,2 +0,1).

I occasionally find myself operating with autocad lt (on the laptop) and this possibility is not found, i.e. if I double-click on the quota this blessed window (from which I can also indicate the prefixes type the ø diameter symbol) just do not find it.

Is it my problem that I don't know lt or this version doesn't have the function of managing the tolerance fields? how can I overcome the problem?

I thank in advance who will answer me. a greeting to all and good work.
r.

 

[PlannerRoad]

Right-click on the quota -> properties -> at the end of the panel find tolerances
if you want to act on the single quota.
otherwise if tolerance concerns all odds you have to go to change the quota style.
all this in autocad full... I assume it's the same.

 

[PlannerRoad]

I realize now that this is your first message and you haven't submitted.
a small presentation is welcome in the special section:
http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=187

 

[Roberto Michelizza]

Hello and thank you for the answer.
I just showed up on the link you indicated, thank you.

from your answer I understand that on lt I lose the very convenient functionality of the mechanical to manage the tolerances as the procedure you indicated is much slower and with less chance?

 

[GiGa]

from your answer I understand that on lt I lose the very convenient functionality of the mechanical to manage the tolerances as the procedure you indicated is much slower and with less chance?

Yeah, that's a mechanical pre-regulation. .
when I used lt, I had solved with a mega-menu with all the tolerances that edited the quota text, obviously not in lisp (see that lt does not support it). .
After so much time, however, I don't even know where to start to do it again (besides the fact that you are certainly not little to compile it with all values). .

 

[Roberto Michelizza]

thanks for the answers.
it was as I imagined....or the mech or I attack!!! !
Thanks again, hello

 

[Tristan]

thanks for the answers.
it was as I imagined....or the mech or I attack!!! !
Thanks again, hello

They would use all of them if the two products were the same, wouldn't they?

 

[Roberto Michelizza]

Of course, but the comparison with the mech does not stop at the quotation system. there are dozens of other features that make the mech superior for my business.
I only have the need on the notebook to have lt (sometimes I happen on-site to fill out fields of tolerance and do it with difficulty/loss of time).
for the rest in the studio I have the mech and the problem does not arise....
Hi.