management of revisions

[genesis1975]

Hello everyone, I wanted to ask how you handle changes to the parts on solidworks... in a set of parts called model to change a part of it that has its own unique code....how will I call it? code+ rev1? or a different code? how do you use the revision table? the part that has been replaced in the assembly is kept in the list parts to have a historian?

 

[Dum]

being a pdmless bum I organized by putting a _a after all drawing numbers.

with the custom properties of the task scheduler I put the design number without index, so in the cartiglio does not appear.

in case of revision, except for the assemblies like _b, the particular or the details (and relative masses in the table) that change with _b and then I deceive the total and relative mit.
then manually adjust the voice of the revisions present in the paper mill.

so I also have the old versions and I have all the history.


sent by my clt-l09 using tapatalk

 

[genesis1975]

So you tell me that the modified part gives a suffix, then even if it changes only that part you make a copy of the original total to and you call it b

 

[genesis1975]

Keep

 

[Dum]

Yes.
exactly.

in the separate base I made so that the file name appears and not the changing property of the scheduler, so in the separate will be recalled automatically the revised detail.

you can also opt to work through configurations. .
but I think it's more work to organize them well than the "problem" of having x copies of the same overall.

clear that the "best much" would be the pdm..
but it has a cost not indifferent. .

sent by my clt-l09 using tapatalk

 

[leggera]

Good evening,

but is there a possibility to start with the revision 0 (zero) and not 1 ?
I couldn't find it between the various configurations.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

but is there a possibility to start with the revision 0 (zero) and not 1 ?

Where? in what environment?

I couldn't find it between the various configurations.

What do configurations have to do with it?

 

[leggera]

in table revisions on drawing.

by configurations I meant options > > document properties > tables > revisions.

I have sw at work I don't remember all the precise terms when I write from home.

if we use the letters start from to, but if we use the numbers start from 1.
Is there a possibility to start from 0 on the revision table?

I hope I was clearer.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I hope I was clearer.

Now you; entering into a discussion in which you were talking about revisions at management level and not drawing your question was unclear.

I have sw at work I don't remember all the precise terms when I write from home.

It doesn't seem like an excuse to me, it's okay that you don't have solidworks underhand, I don't have it either, but if you write wrong terms, you're making confusion to those who read you. deepen with the guide, which is also on the network, the concept and express it correctly.

Is there a possibility to start from 0 on the revision table?

to a first look, looking on the net, it seems not.

 

[leggera]

I couldn't find anything about it either.
if we want to force the table by replacing the first revision that sw allocates 1 with 0 then the next puts it with 2 and then it would be point and end.
There is some video that illustrates how to do with the pdm, but not having it I did not deepen it.

also this user has the same my problem on the forum solidworks, but no one answered.

SOLIDWORKS Forums

The home for the SOLIDWORKS Forum. REAL People, REAL Experiences, REAL Knowledge.

forum.solidworks.com

So I assume you can do little.

 

[ceschi1959]

I had never placed the problem but also from us the revisions start from number 1 with our pdm. In fact, tell me if I'm wrong, the first release of the drawing is not revised, so the first modification seems logical to me that it starts from 1.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

In fact, tell me if I'm wrong, the first release of the drawing is not revised, so the first modification seems logical to me that it starts from 1.

I see a lot of drawings, even foreign ones, in which the first version shows the revision 0, but it is not revision, but emission.
I think the first revision should start from 1 and I add that the table should only be inserted if there is a revision, if there is no revision is 0.
It is also true that many drawings report a revision table in which the row 0 is present before issue; but this I think is a legacy of drawings managed manually (technigrfo, autocad...).
I do not know other parametric cads, I think it makes the reasoning that the revision table should only be inserted in case of change.
an escamotage is to insert embedded into the cartilage, or in any case on the sheet, a table line with revision 0 to which the revision table will subsequently be hooked that will partition correctly from 1 in order to create continuity in the displayed rows

 

[leggera]

in fact rev 0 is the emission of the design also in my case.
a zero point, a current state where to leave, then in case of changes you pass to the following number.
In fact you can omit the revision table in rev.0 and report it only in the cartiglio, next to the code in my case.
I can do this so I think it's logical.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

In fact you can omit the revision table in rev.0 and report it only in the cartiglio, next to the code in my case.

but so if you do a revision you have to change the value of the cartilage. I don't know if you can connect the field to a table, I think it's to be done manually.
I meant to add a neutral table made by a line in which to insert the fields that will be the default ones (except the date and designer that you can fish from the properties) so that is always present
facsimile to the image.
just insert the line on the sheet formats and you can do it retroactively (soon a little patience)

 

[massimo78]

I was looking for something on the review tables and I got caught up in this post.
personally I have always created a new configuration (I actually worked with create therefore with family tables, but it is equal) with the suffix _rx, where x is clearly the revision number.
so doing I keep a historian both 3d and 2d.
but the biggest advantage I find in case you want to go back or anyway in making simulations before/after