Er Presidente
Guest
14m, then evolved in 14k never managed to overcome the 800 cv wall, despite the 1000 seemed discounted.
all versions over 900 cv were very unreliable.
I don't have certain information about what problems they'd arise, but it would seem that the vibrations were the biggest problem.
studying this manual would be interesting to be able to discover the "tallone d'achille" of this project.
the only "solid" version was the one built by the isotta fraschini, but immediately abandoned after the first prototypes in favor of the piaggio that had acquired the same license.
the if version was deeply revised in the structure and eventually weighed even more, so some structural intervention had considered it necessary.
I personally consider the choice to maintain all the distribution of the two stars commanded by the same front, opinable and hole of potential "unequalities" between them and which could be the basis of vibration problems.
Even the "discomposed" carter does not seem very solid as a solution, we will see later if the competitors and/or the version if they had different choices.
the if was famous for its expertise in large aluminium castings, derived from the experience in its monoblock headboards, but it is not said that this is the difference.
a comparison with American "radials" will be necessary, also because they were able to reach 2000 cv without particular problems (structural, others, "to iosa").
all versions over 900 cv were very unreliable.
I don't have certain information about what problems they'd arise, but it would seem that the vibrations were the biggest problem.
studying this manual would be interesting to be able to discover the "tallone d'achille" of this project.
the only "solid" version was the one built by the isotta fraschini, but immediately abandoned after the first prototypes in favor of the piaggio that had acquired the same license.
the if version was deeply revised in the structure and eventually weighed even more, so some structural intervention had considered it necessary.
I personally consider the choice to maintain all the distribution of the two stars commanded by the same front, opinable and hole of potential "unequalities" between them and which could be the basis of vibration problems.
Even the "discomposed" carter does not seem very solid as a solution, we will see later if the competitors and/or the version if they had different choices.
the if was famous for its expertise in large aluminium castings, derived from the experience in its monoblock headboards, but it is not said that this is the difference.
a comparison with American "radials" will be necessary, also because they were able to reach 2000 cv without particular problems (structural, others, "to iosa").