• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

matching flange in combination

  • Thread starter Thread starter andreaf93
  • Start date Start date

andreaf93

Guest
Good evening to all,
this evening I ask you if there is the possibility to use a function, modifying the part directly in the axieme, which allows to create a flange that coincides with a side edge of another part present in the axieme.

example in the image below.
I also work together. Thank you.domanda.webp
 

Attachments

part change and use other axieme geometries to draw the sketch and flange function
 
part change and use other axieme geometries to draw the sketch and flange function
In fact from the beginning I tried so but I can not understand why it does not work or where I sin: in the image reported I try to make the two sides coincide but the flange does not arrive at the end of the sheet below.
 

Attachments

  • domanda1.webp
    domanda1.webp
    31.9 KB · Views: 10
Obviously so is not possible. try to put yourself normal at the sketch and think how it can extend to where you would like... You should draw reference sketches so as to project the line up to the vertical edge and as a whole you must first build planes that coincide with that of the other side.Immagine.webpfunctions and sketches must be done with a design logic and if this logic turns out to be wrong it starts from scratch.
make a nice sketch in the shape of l on the plane perpendicular to what you work now and you're fine
 
Obviously so is not possible. try to put yourself normal at the sketch and think how it can extend to where you would like... You should draw reference sketches so as to project the line up to the vertical edge and as a whole you must first build planes that coincide with that of the other side.

functions and sketches must be done with a design logic and if this logic turns out to be wrong it starts from scratch.
make a nice sketch in the shape of l on the plane perpendicular to what you work now and you're fine
here I do but it doesn't give me the chance to use the drilling command, I don't understand where I miss it as it should also be quite simple.
You could attach your file to me so I see what logic you used. Thank you.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
the point must be on the line of the flange sketch and not on that, which I did, by construction.
the only shortness because the drilling constraint goes to good end is not to put other constraints to the point in addition to the coincidence with the line, so be careful that you do not run an average point bond
 
perfect all clear and works. Thank you.
only to understand the sw logic because if I put the point in the flange sketch works while if the point I put it on the construction line, sw does not allow you to perform the drilling coupling? Thank you.
 
because it serves that line and point are on intersecting planes.
the point on the flange adapts its positioning and drags behind the coin line; the point on the construction line instead lies on a closed and unchangeable sketch
 
is it possible that sw automatically calculates the fold angle according to the variation of the current quota 99.66 (doing so that the relationships before drilling between line and point remain unchanged)? Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • domanda2.webp
    domanda2.webp
    49.8 KB · Views: 3
Maybe making equations. If you want to hurt yourself, you can try
but if you changed the modeling would be much easier. see video
 

Attachments

I started modeling in that way in fact I could set everything very easily only that I found it difficult to work on the sketch of the various flanges. However I try to bang our head again in both ways and possibly publish updates. Good evening.
 
if the model is more complex to us it is not given know, otherwise in the sketch video there is only one; and it is certainly easier to manage one than three as in your current situation.
Of course, we think about the data available. each model has a modeling logic itself that depends on its complexity and the final goal and a good modeler is not the one who knows how to use the commands well, but what he seeks and finds the best solution for the specific case also remaking the model several times
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top