material appearance in cartiglio

[Bidaniele]

Hello everyone
use inventor 2014
I wanted to ask you some things for the automatic compilation of the cartiglio: is it right to bind the appearance of the material to the surface treatment item in the cartilage?? ?
type put a c40 material and make a burnished look
at the end I find myself in the cartiglio both the voice of the material c40 and the voice surface treatment brunito.
This means that I make equal materials with different names (to tie them to a different aspect ) , for example to make an anodized aluminium material and an aluminium with a rough appearance (we use both).
I can't see if it's a good thing or just a complication.
I don't know if I explained well.
Thank you.

 

[Ilario]

I press that I do not know, but if I did not understand badly with 2014 you can tie the aspects to a property (which is what you say). I (if you can) will detach the two material speeches - I would look and apply the aspect "anodized" to the part itself and not to the material, in the sense that the material will look normal associated with itself, then if you want to change the appearance, you will only wield that, part by part individually and should associate the look of that specific part on the table. .

I hope I explained. . .

 

[Bidaniele]

the fact is that each material has associated a default appearance
for example aluminum can have an anodized associated appearance.
the default association comes out automatically
this is only an association and can also be replaced.
there is also a button in the bar (close to the appearance button) that restores the default aspects of the part.
I think it's better to keep the materials associated with the appearance.

What are you talking about? ?
Do I add a complication or improvement?? ?


I wanted to ask for something else (I'm new in 3d design)
in the design phase with 100-500 or a thousand details, is it more convenient to work with colored parts (like red, yellow blue) or to keep the appearance of the material?? ? ?