mating for rehabilitation!

[m_arquati]

Hi.

in the attached image, I am looking for a simple leverage solution: opening the right stick you have to open even the left one but faster... I can't understand what kind of mating I have to use to bind the lever to the left stick at the point I say! (the tondino in the bascula sx: I thought I could use the concentric there but it makes me mistake because it says it's ultra-defined!

Thank you so much!
Mar

 

[marcof]

Hi.

in the attached image, I am looking for a simple leverage solution: opening the right stick you have to open even the left one but faster... I can't understand what kind of mating I have to use to bind the lever to the left stick at the point I say! (the tondino in the bascula sx: I thought I could use the concentric there but it makes me mistake because it says it's ultra-defined!

Thank you so much!
Mar

if it tells you that it is ultradefinite there is obviously some bond of too
you also understand that from the image is not that you can understand what moves, what not and how the couplings are made; You know how you shaped him, we don't. If you put the axieme is better.

 

[Poly]

It's likely to give you ultradefined because your arm is too short.

 

[sampom]

Hi.

in the attached image, I am looking for a simple leverage solution: opening the right stick you have to open even the left one but faster... I can't understand what kind of mating I have to use to bind the lever to the left stick at the point I say! (the tondino in the bascula sx: I thought I could use the concentric there but it makes me mistake because it says it's ultra-defined!

Thank you so much!
Mar

Forgive me but from what I can see/understand with that type of leverage would be "ultradefinito" even in reality (and for greater reason). in the sense that it just cannot work;
the lever to dx moves back a lot, while the fixing point of the biella on the sx has very little freedom in that sense, and indeed shortly after should do the reverse turn. but how would it be possible if the lever "motor" continues to pull in the opposite direction? ?
I think you should see the whole thing again.

if you want a hand placed the assembling (and the parts) and explains how and how much movement they have to do the two bascules, starting and coming positions etc., in other words from the "two numbers" :biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

p.s. or maybe I understood wrong and the opening is down/inside the box? from, post files

 

[marcof]

Hi.

in the attached image, I am looking for a simple leverage solution: opening the right stick you have to open even the left one but faster... I can't understand what kind of mating I have to use to bind the lever to the left stick at the point I say!

Instead of being killed immediately, it would be much more productive and fast to make a simple sketch quoted with the right degrees of freedom .
try to see what I attach (10 minutes clock to do it and correct the odds). if you move the extreme of the right stick the left moves more slowly without intersecting each other. with that kind of leverage I have you can't get both horizontal and do the movement you want without interference. Try to change some odds and see you.
I forgot, from the image you posted I understood that the opening is inside.. .But I think it is useless to ask that clear, concise questions arise and that they can be understood at the first blow by those who are not doing the Your work, but strange doing his ownHi.

p.s.
About my work, m_arquati, would you tell me if the upper part of the frame compared to the hole is better than fixing it on the right side or on the left side? I would like to put it on the right but then I find myself the mechanism supervinculated, yet it should work equally because it is symmetrical to the plane of the pulley...! :biggrin:

p.p.s have I made better the idea of what I wrote in the paragraph in red?

 

[sampom]

p.s.
About my work, m_arquati, would you tell me if the upper part of the frame compared to the hole is better than fixing it on the right side or on the left side? I would like to put it on the right but then I find myself the mechanism supervinculated, yet it should work equally because it is symmetrical to the plane of the pulley...! :biggrin:

p.p.s have I made better the idea of what I wrote in the paragraph in red?

Prematured. . ?
:biggrin::biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[marcof]

But I think it is useless to ask that clear, concise questions arise and that they can be understood at the first blow by those who are not doing the Your work, but strange doing his ownp.s.
About my work, m_arquati, would you tell me if the upper part of the frame compared to the hole is better than fixing it on the right side or on the left side? I would like to put it on the right but then I find myself the mechanism supervinculated, yet it should work equally because it is symmetrical to the plane of the pulley...! :biggrin:

..prematurata.. ?
:biggrin::biggrin:

Of course, but only as if it were antant eh!

 

[m_arquati]

Bye to all,

It seems to me that my arm is short... but I measured it and made it accordingly.. . :angry:

for two days I'm not in the office and so I don't have sw... as soon as I can get it I look at the examples and place my files!


Thank you so much!
Mar

 

[m_arquati]

Exactly marcof!

Your example is exactly what I would want to get!
I attach my file!

Marcof: I don't understand

...if the upper part of the frame compared to the hole is better than fixing it on the right or on the left side?

ciao ciao!

 

[sampom]

I attach my file!

e dov'è?

Marcof: I don't understand

marco (already too many brands are here.. and to think that not long ago they also had a certain value:biggrin, it was a joke.:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[clingonboy]

a courageous and alternative solution could be to fix on the pins 2 pulleys with different diameter united by a cord, finding the right relationship between the diameters will rotate at 2 different speeds... .
Maybe it's a bit stale but feasible. .
greetings to all