mating on mail

[sofa80]

Hello everyone

I ask for your clarification regarding the mating on the spot:
Is it possible to replace it at a later stage in advanced design?
- if for what reason "sail" can be replaced?
in practice after performing the cavity command on part t02-av.est.br la part t03-av.br loses mating on site
and I can't fix the situation
allego files for those who can try to get better my problem

Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Is it possible to replace it at a later stage in advanced design?
- if for what reason "sail" can be replaced?

delete and use standard couplings

if you do not want the coupling on the spot, but also bind you to the existing geometries, at the time of the creation of the new internal part to the axieme click on an empty area of the graphic area; this creates the new part without coupling with and without changing part

 

[sofa80]

so I lose all the references of the sketch and is defined below
Where am I wrong? ?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

in practice after performing the cavity command on the part t02-av.est.br the part t03-av.br loses the coupling on the place

I can deduce that with this function you have deleted the face you clicked on when you entered the part; eliminated face mating goes wrong.
does not seem to me it is possible to restore or correct a mating on the place; I fear that the only way is to eliminate it, to bind with standard couplings and to fix the sketch

 

[sofa80]

I can deduce that with this function you deleted the face you clicked on when you entered the part

, the face has been erased, probably replacing a mating on the spot creates more problems than standard couplings, after various tests, I had to cancel the mating on the spot and almost totally remake the sketch
to this point I divided the body, with command divides, and I hid the excess piece
I attach the file with the procedure made

Thank you.

 

[sofa80]

probably replacing a mating on the spot creates more problems than standard couplings

then between mating on the spot and clicking in the void at the time of creation new part , would it be better to favor this second procedure except for the fact that you have to click for change part, create sketch and select plan? ?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

then between mating on the spot and clicking in the void at the time of creation new part , would it be better to favor this second procedure except for the fact that you have to click for change part, create sketch and select plan? ?

as many situations depend on context.
the coupling on the spot seems suitable for projects in which the base is already defined (for example to integrate a proven project or another study)
the creation of a part without accopiamento on the spot, is however created in fixed condition, seems suitable for development projects in which it is not certain what and how it can be modified

 

[sofa80]

ok massive
thanks for your support