matrici di fori

[marcofa]

I must perform a series of holes with different diameters and interaxes but with equal reference hole (the red one). of course the reference hole will be of greater diameter.
I performed the first matrix on the small diameter reference.
I widened the reference hole.
I made a second matrix. in the latter remain the hazelnuts of the smaller holes as if he had made a pocket with the two diameters.

how not to make hazelnuts appear? ? ?
Mar

 

[Mocca]

I'm sorry, but I didn't understand what you'd like to do.
Meanwhile I tell you that, seeing the image, you can remove the "small hole" of the big hole with the command "remove padded"; find it in the boolean shovel (last of the 4 commands).
touch the general prism after which touches only one of the many faces that includes the "excessive prime" to be channeled; In your case you will touch for example the 3 upper faces of the 3 small cylinders.
to reach the problem instead you could try to use the custom matrices using the same sketch for both the big hole and the small hole; in the execution of the matics you can omit the copy by clicking on the red dot at the center of each duplicated item in this way you can manage the different duplications by controlling them from the same sketch.
I hope to state aid.
Mouth

 

[marcofa]

great and thank you for the padding removal.
I don't understand.
the custom matrix serves to create a matrix without consistency between rows and columns, i.e. scattered holes. but to create it I have to use a basic hole as for the standard matrix.
if you then raise the base hole and use another matrix (personalized or not) the filling is created the same.
Mar

 

[Mocca]

the custom matrix needs a sketch containing points; no matter if these are unordered or aligned in rows and columns as if they were the center of a rectangular matrix. :wink:
in your case I would use a personlized matrix for large holes and another custom matrix for small holes; you have greater flexibility in choosing centers, everything is in correctly parameterizing points within the sketch.
another alternative could be to insert a rectangular matrix (to which you are attached) for all holes considering them all small after which I would go to give negative "thickness" to those who will have to become big.
they taught me that to get to the same result there are many roads; choose what you think is easier in realisation and easy in future and possible change. :finger:
We said hello.