mechanical piece assonometry

[SimoESimi]

Hello everyone, I am a mechanical engineering student and I have to do a simple (named) assonometry that for many of you will be very simple. I attach the image of what I have to do.

Could you give me some insights about how to do that? Thank you in advance!

 

[Max-C]

How? There are several. Usually the issometric and/or cavalry are required during studies...

 

[SimoESimi]

How? There are several. Usually the issometric and/or cavalry are required during studies...

isometric assonometry, that of 120°. Sorry, I forgot.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

where the problem is.... if you have solidworks models the piece and make the table with all kinds of views you want.
3d c'est plus easy

 

[marcof]

where the problem is.... if you have solidworks models the piece and make the table with all kinds of views you want.
3d c'est plus easy

I have the vague impression that in reality ask how to realize the assonometric view in autocad as if he was using the tecnigraph or the two teams, to sound of lines of construction.
from what is often read here it seems precisely that in many universities they still feel useful that type of exercise of gymnastics (already abundantly faced in middle and upper) not contenting that the student, carrying out a 3d model to learn from that table, proves to be able to correctly interpret the 2d representations.
but how much time do they lose with the prehistoric minkies?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

but if you do it in solid and export it in autocad, maybe giving it a system, who realizes that it was made with 3d?

 

[Max-C]

I have the vague impression that in reality ask how to realize the assonometric view in autocad as if he was using the tecnigraph or the two teams, to sound of lines of construction.
from what is often read here it seems precisely that in many universities they still feel useful that type of exercise (already abundantly faced in middle and upper) not contenting that the student, carrying out a 3d model to learn from that table, demonstrates that he can correctly interpret the 2d representations.
but how much time do they lose with the prehistoric minkies?

depends on what superiors are made:.
However it is true, you lose a lot of time with the now obsolete arguments and very little for the current things. in fact I would do the theory about books to pass to the exercises (or at least most) in software of dynamic cinematic simulations, fem etc.. would come out of the much more complete and competitive aunt. . .

 

[SimoESimi]

I have the vague impression that in reality ask how to realize the assonometric view in autocad as if he was using the tecnigraph or the two teams, to sound of lines of construction.
from what is often read here it seems precisely that in many universities they still feel useful that type of exercise of gymnastics (already abundantly faced in middle and upper) not contenting that the student, carrying out a 3d model to learn from that table, proves to be able to correctly interpret the 2d representations.
but how much time do they lose with the prehistoric minkies?

You got it. I have to do isometrics on sheet, honestly I have no idea.

 

[marcof]

You got it. I have to do isometrics on sheet, honestly I have no idea.

Well, we put a little dowel on it.

And now we know you have to draw by hand.

but "I have no idea..." of what?
try to be precise please, that we are at the eighth post and still do not know in a way unequivocal* what you need

1. Do you have any idea how to make an isometric representation?
2. Can't interpret the design, so don't think of how that piece is done?
3. points 1 and 2 contempranemente?

*It should be unequivocal because no one has time to lose to give you explanations that you may not need only because your questions are suitable for multiple interpretations and answers.

 

[SimoESimi]

Well, we put a little dowel on it.

And now we know you have to draw by hand.

but "I have no idea..." of what?
try to be precise please, that we are at the eighth post and still do not know in a way unequivocal* what you need

1. Do you have any idea how to make an isometric representation?
2. Can't interpret the design, so don't think of how that piece is done?
3. points 1 and 2 contempranemente?

*It should be unequivocal because no one has time to lose to give you explanations that you may not need only because your questions are suitable for multiple interpretations and answers.

I can't imagine the piece as a result I can't draw it.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

You do it in 3d like this:
a. you exercise with the program
b. you have a vision of how the piece is made
c. do the isometric view from which you understand how it should be hand drawn

 

[marcof]

I can't imagine the piece as a result I can't draw it.

That's a big deal.
how to explain how that piece is done without showing it in 3d making you a bad service?
You don't have any idea how it's done, and that tracked part what it represents?

 

[cacciatorino]

I can't imagine the piece as a result I can't draw it.

I think your problem is not knowing the mechanical design. Therefore you can't do assonometric view.

perhaps you lack the propedeutic knowledge to understand that set of lines and graphic signs: The only thing you can do is start from the beginning of the drawing book.

 

[SHIREN]

Hi.
perhaps the view from to does not correspond to the sez to six

 

[meccanicamg]

Hello everyone, I am a mechanical engineering student and I have to do a simple (named) assonometry that for many of you will be very simple. I attach the image of what I have to do.

Could you give me some insights about how to do that? Thank you in advance!

It is also wrong and incomplete....the dx view is not so half-saving... seen that it is neither half-sectioned nor there are symmetric symbols.

half view and half section is ok.

but are they able to make drawings on books?

 

[SHIREN]

Hi.
perhaps the view from to does not correspond to the sez to six

It is also wrong and incomplete....the dx view is not so half-saving... seen that it is neither half-sectioned nor there are symmetric symbols.

half view and half section is ok.

but are they able to make drawings on books?

hello mechanics
simoesimi was right not to be able to view the piece and then draw it in assonometry
I know two completely different things
But that design came out of a university??? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Thank you very much

 

[marcof]

It is also wrong and incomplete....the dx view is not so half-saving... seen that it is neither half-sectioned nor there are symmetric symbols.

half view and half section is ok.

but are they able to make drawings on books?

is not the first time you see drawings for educational purposes with various variations. despite this no one has ever exchanged a cube for a ball...

hello mechanics
simoesimi was right not to be able to view the piece and then draw it in assonometry
I know two completely different things

Let's not exaggerate. You want to tell me that you didn't understand what that piece was like because they represented half flange in the right view and that you can't see the solid? I don't believe it. :smile:
that then this is yet another demonstration that design 2d is an unnatural representation of reality is another speech:tongue:. in 3d the piece maybe it is wrong because it has a hole in less or in diameter different from what should be, but no one, not even the first that goes on the street and that it deals with anything else, would not be able to immediately understand the form (an eye that I wrote "form", not "function")

 

[meccanicamg]

is not the first time you see drawings for educational purposes with various variations. despite this no one has ever exchanged a cube for a ball...



Let's not exaggerate. You want to tell me that you didn't understand what that piece was like because they represented half flange in the right view and that you can't see the solid? I don't believe it. :smile:
that then this is yet another demonstration that design 2d is an unnatural representation of reality is another speech:tongue:. in 3d the piece maybe it is wrong because it has a hole in less or in diameter different from what should be, but no one, not even the first that goes on the street and that it deals with anything else, would not be able to immediately understand the form (an eye that I wrote "form", not "function")

pear flange, log, circular flange. but so represented does shit. I want to see tomorrow with solidworks if I have such a disgusting view that he lacks two lines of closing the pear.

 

[SHIREN]

is not the first time you see drawings for educational purposes with various variations. despite this no one has ever exchanged a cube for a ball...



Let's not exaggerate. You want to tell me that you didn't understand what that piece was like because they represented half flange in the right view and that you can't see the solid? I don't believe it. :smile:
that then this is yet another demonstration that design 2d is an unnatural representation of reality is another speech:tongue:. in 3d the piece maybe it is wrong because it has a hole in less or in diameter different from what should be, but no one, not even the first that goes on the street and that it deals with anything else, would not be able to immediately understand the form (an eye that I wrote "form", not "function")

hi marcof is always a pleasure to read:finger:
You know how I feel about 2e3d
we have already crossed
in the view from to I have to see one hole god.72
instead there is a hole with two other circles (except if so dotted and the graphics of the drawing and poor)
as if the view was on the other side
Then there's a hatch out of the god 260
in the sez I can afford to make a 1/2 sez and a 1/2 view
but make a false view in a view indicated and out of every logic
a strong hug

 

[marcof]

pear flange, log, circular flange. but so represented it sucks

It was clear to everyone, I think, that it was not a work of art. but the question is that sympathizers, that must make a design to handle and not with swx, did not manage to understand for nothing what it is, and certainly not because there are two lines in the flange.