megabug!!!! hay the equations.. .

[re_solidworks]

the solution as I said is in the user account. before installing sw, besides disable the antivirus go into User account-control panel-change user account control settings and select never notify. at the end of the installation if you want you can restore the default value or set another at will. practically, by default, the user account when sw tries to install the prerequisites does not alert you, just skip them. disable it, install it without asking anything.
As for the improper disbanding of the mega bug, I would not seem pedant but I believe that even if it is a winzozzeria, it would still be the case to verify the compatibility of the software with the various know before dealing them around the world. It is not normal that one should seek at own expense (because not even assistance often knows where to go to parare) the solution to the problem. when I bought sw I did it at the expense of pro/e and the motivation I gave was the long time that would take me to enter the ptc method. I don't want to start losing some other way to regret my choice. I lost five days behind this. Who pays?

my problem is that that setting has always been so on my pc. I tried to uninstall and reinstall:
in service pack 0.0 everything works, after the service pack (from 0 to 2.1) I recompile the error to insert elle equations.

 

[Mike1967]

"zomma... usable by all those who have made the draw from win3.1. As for usability, you are not even able to inspire the ergonomics of apple so.
try to put in hand a pc with win7 (or even osx) to a person who if you talk to him about the mouse thinks of a rat :smile: and then you can realize what makes usability or not.

Well, I had the first approach to PC at the age of 30, until then I thought computers were tools for brains while after a short time I realized the potential... I started with win98.
if many praise the mac, how ever the majority of the user jumps
(It is a question, not a provocation. . )
I, as a neophyte, think that without windows I probably would never start using the pc.
to me changed the life, until 10 years ago I was at the bench to weld, cut, bend and make the mounts in the yard, now, work in an air-conditioned office
and with all the comforts... He changed my life, thank you, Uncle Bill, I can say:wink:

 

[maxopus]

Well, I had the first approach to PC at the age of 30, until then I thought computers were tools for brains while after a short time I realized the potential... I started with win98.
if many praise the mac, how ever the majority of the user jumps
(It is a question, not a provocation. . )
I, as a neophyte, think that without windows I probably would never start using the pc.
to me changed the life, until 10 years ago I was at the bench to weld, cut, bend and make the mounts in the yard, now, work in an air-conditioned office
and with all the comforts... He changed my life, thank you, Uncle Bill, I can say:wink:

It's a long story, when I started using windows PCs, it wasn't yet born.
the most used system for compatible ibm pcs (called so) was dos.
for graphics there was already mac, for professional applications there was in practice only one solution ... unix.

when microsoft saw the potential of the pc market has copiato e incollato the interfaces of the mac systems on these to make them more user friendly but, at the time the pc systems with windows (3.1 and then 3.11) were not even comparable to the mac. too much difference in performance and stability.
PCs were junk that was made in chorea and cina... mac had risc processors and scsi interfaces for peripherals.

then... history has changed but, mac for two decades has given heels to all others.

 

[Mike1967]

It's a long story, when I started using windows PCs, it wasn't yet born.
the most used system for compatible ibm pcs (called so) was dos.
for graphics there was already mac, for professional applications there was in practice only one solution ... unix.

when microsoft saw the potential of the pc market has copiato e incollato the interfaces of the mac systems on these to make them more user friendly but, at the time the pc systems with windows (3.1 and then 3.11) were not even comparable to the mac. too much difference in performance and stability.
PCs were junk that was made in chorea and cina... mac had risc processors and scsi interfaces for peripherals.

then... history has changed but, mac for two decades has given heels to all others.

coincidental and exhaustive.
:finger:

 

[cacciatorino]

It's a long story, when I started using windows PCs, it wasn't yet born.
the most used system for compatible ibm pcs (called so) was dos.
for graphics there was already mac, for professional applications there was in practice only one solution ... unix.

when microsoft saw the potential of the pc market has copiato e incollato the interfaces of the mac systems on these to make them more user friendly but, at the time the pc systems with windows (3.1 and then 3.11) were not even comparable to the mac. too much difference in performance and stability.
PCs were junk that was made in chorea and cina... mac had risc processors and scsi interfaces for peripherals.

then... history has changed but, mac for two decades has given heels to all others.

to say that up to xp, the microsoft has always had two lines of products, the dos derivatives for the marmaglia, and instead the nt series (nt 3.5, nt4, w2000) for those with the pc worked. I have never used the various win3.11 and win95, but have passed from unix to nt4, I cannot complain at all.

ah, where I did the thesis used mac, it was 96-97, and I assure you that the computers were always stacked even if they were mac. They may have had a bad record, but those operating systems like 8.6 or 7.5 aren't that they were better than a win98.

And anyway, to finish, so you'll understand how much esteem I have mac, the topolon and the window interface are a xerox invention, and I already had them both on my 1992 digital decstation ws....