modeling advice

[volaff]

good evening, I would like to make a plastic part that "covers" the celestial part and embraces the red tube in the figure (image01 and 02)(going to create a new part in the axieme of figure and modeling "round" to the components)

to do this I had thought to "use" surfaces highlighted in image03 to make offset surfaces and then, through thickenings and solid unions to achieve what was my intent (a similar approach to image04).

honestly I don't have much familiarity with the surfaces and I wondered what was the most "correct" way (of course here is all subjective and also much) to proceed.
I have noticed that very often the sw is in thickenings and cuts with surfaces.

in my head I wanted to create offsets of the surfaces that define the contour of my object and with thickenings and cuts with the surfaces of the compost already present model (or try at least) this kind of plastic "close".

a little more experienced could tell me which road would go and why? ?

between offsets and thickenings the tree is as long as the river a little; also I often have problems in extinguishing the surfaces (which sw extends a little to approx...)

Thank you very much to all for any advice.

greetings

fly

 

[Lettore espatriato]

I agree with you on everything and allow me to highlight...
1) Class a surfaces (concept difficult to explain) never end at a point. are four-sided surfaces of preference. try to make a surface for three sides and you will see that at one point it grows.
....
Hi.

However, you should distinguish between "building surfaces" (or "extended" or "mothers" or "untrimmed" ) and "end surfaces" (or "trimmed" or "relimited").
The second can also be restricted with a triangular profile, circular, dodecaedric, as far as I remember.

 

[ceschi1959]

However, you should distinguish between "building surfaces" (or "extended" or "mothers" or "untrimmed" ) and "end surfaces" (or "trimmed" or "relimited").
The second can also be restricted with a triangular profile, circular, dodecaedric, as far as I remember.

read the post well: I highlighted three errors in a film. one of these was the construction of a surface for three sides and not its delimitation.
p.s. a surface can be delimited even with a single curve.

 

[Lettore espatriato]

good evening, I would like to make a plastic part that "covers" the celestial part and embraces the red tube in the figure (image01 and 02)(going to create a new part in the axieme of figure and modeling "round" to the components)

to do this I had thought to "use" surfaces highlighted in image03 to make offset surfaces and then, through thickenings and solid unions to achieve what was my intent (a similar approach to image04).

honestly I don't have much familiarity with the surfaces and I wondered what was the most "correct" way (of course here is all subjective and also much) to proceed.
I have noticed that very often the sw is in thickenings and cuts with surfaces.

in my head I wanted to create offsets of the surfaces that define the contour of my object and with thickenings and cuts with the surfaces of the compost already present model (or try at least) this kind of plastic "close".

a little more experienced could tell me which road would go and why? ?

between offsets and thickenings the tree is as long as the river a little; also I often have problems in extinguishing the surfaces (which sw extends a little to approx...)

Thank you very much to all for any advice.

greetings

fly

looks like a foam from the back of a seat. But maybe I'm wrong.
I would begin to separate the construction in two "macro sets": the part that follows the celestial component and the part that will have to "abbrace" the tube.

 

[Lettore espatriato]

... I highlighted three mistakes in a film. one of these was the construction of a surface for three sides and not its delimitation.
. .

Well, it's better now.

...
p.s. a surface can be delimited even with a single curve.

in fact I wrote "triangular, circular, dodecaedric" to indicate forms not with 4 sides. it became a bit long to make the whole list of possible alternatives.

:finger:

 

[volaff]

looks like a foam from the back of a seat. But maybe I'm wrong.
I would begin to separate the construction in two "macro sets": the part that follows the celestial component and the part that will have to "abbrace" the tube.

That's exactly what you thought it was.