modifiche part

[Geppetto82]

Bye to all,
we are making the first prototypes of a new project.
you know how it works at this stage: changes, counter-modifications, away, look at this, look at that, re-modifications, etc....
to this project we have been behind for more than a year and a half, the project has been seen and reviewed several times often even at a distance of months.
the fact of taking the 3d in hand even at a distance of different time and the rush, pressure, "mania" to make changes on the 3d to realize to the cnc has led me to work not correctly: In a part of this project I have a feature manager tree of over 40 functions and when I ask myself certain modifications for the above reasons I have not been to change the functions of the tree as it should be done but I have remade of new ones, because maybe the old functions were connected to others and if I made that change to scale I changed the associated later functions. . I'm sorry. .
When the manager of this project comes to me and sits next to me and take the 3d, he begins to say: "Let's try to do this, move the entire shaft of the holes, add a bearing here, take that wheel away, see what happens if..." in one way or another I try to satisfy his demands. at the end the piece came out, but it was not drawn correctly. If they ask me for other changes, what will happen sooner or later, I see badly! !
Now how would you behave?
I've been told to get my piece back. .
how do you manage all this?

thank you all.. .
greetings
geppetto82

 

[Geppetto82]

for greater clarity I attach the pdf 3d of the piece in question....
Probably someone will design more complex details, so I hope you can give me suggestions.
Thank you.
greetings
geppetto82

 

[cacciatorino]

I think you're doing it again in an hour, maybe simulating the workflow of the machine tool, so you're good!

 

[solokite]

for greater clarity I attach the pdf 3d of the piece in question....
Probably someone will design more complex details, so I hope you can give me suggestions.
Thank you.
greetings
geppetto82

not that I treat pieces more difficult, but then make configurations so that if you make changes you can always have an old copy-->"come back to do as it was before" demand that unfortunately very often is made:

 

[ballino]

Bye to all,
I agree with solokite and hunter for the comments posted if the scope is all in the pdf you posted.

If, on the other hand, your intervention also refers to the environment that contains that piece the best approach is a sketch2d with main interassis/quotes between the operating organs, “carne” for resistive aspects and then engulf parts/works of commerce.
the sketch has the advantage of conviving derivative quotas and primary alternating them without moving
Everything.

if then “nose” you have the feeling that the solutions are all the same and that they still have to mature then untie everything and do not shake you.

I forgot: cosmetics come to the end...

good work,
dancer

 

[Geppetto82]

first of all thanks for the suggestions....
as hunter says is the ultimate and safest solution, and the most likely I will adopt.....
for solokite: I did not make configurations (I don't have much familiarity), I created several files by appointing them with the date of change, so if as I happened, I was told to do it as the other time, I just had to open the previous one. Maybe a laborious, but functional.....
what you wrote you dance for me is Arabic, but you completely reset the next problem, i.e. inserting this part into the finite axieme. . .
I have to consult the sketch guide.... I never used them and I don't even know what they are, sigh...