• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

moving parts in a set

  • Thread starter Thread starter BAFALI
  • Start date Start date

BAFALI

Guest
Hello everyone
I need help.
in solidwork I happen to realize subgroups to be reunited then in a general overall.
in the subgroup sometimes I establish in the coupling of 2 details of the constraints that allow a limited flow (for example the stem of a pneumatic cylinder), and dragging it with the mouse you can see the movement:smile:.
but when I insert the subgroup in the overall slide it freezes in the position where it is saved in the subgroup, and you can no longer move it: mad:.
Does someone know if there is a variable to set or a function to unlock to solve the problem:confused:?

Thank you.
 
Hello everyone
I need help.
in solidwork I happen to realize subgroups to be reunited then in a general overall.
in the subgroup sometimes I establish in the coupling of 2 details of the constraints that allow a limited flow (for example the stem of a pneumatic cylinder), and dragging it with the mouse you can see the movement:smile:.
but when I insert the subgroup in the overall slide it freezes in the position where it is saved in the subgroup, and you can no longer move it: mad:.
Does someone know if there is a variable to set or a function to unlock to solve the problem:confused:?

Thank you.
select in the shaft of the assembly, the subaxieme and selection of the component. you open a window, in which at the bottom right you find it written "resolve so" and you have two options one is rigid and it is selected automatically, another is flexible. do this your subaxieme will move:biggrin:.
 
hi in the general axieme the subgroup must be flexible (set dx of the mouse-prprity of the component- in the bottom a dx solves in a flexible way) the subgroup of the tree will change and you will be able to move it with the mouse as you did within the subgroup....
 
having passed to solidworks after 25 years of creo, I take advantage of it by withdrawing out all the old posts...
but to work I have to make virtually flexible all cascading subgroups starting from the first?
 
but to work I have to make virtually flexible all cascading subgroups starting from the first?
depends on what you have to get.
in solidworks the axieme is a group of two or more parts*; These parts can be static among themselves, for example a bolt (of course in reality the nut would rotate, but it does not make sense to do it in a 3d) or furniture, for example a cylinder.
the axieme that contains these parts when inserted into a top-level assembly becomes a monolithic element therefore, in the case of the cylinder they will not be able to move. if instead it is necessary that the cylinder can move to check the operation then it is necessary to set its set as flexible.
can the axioms that do not need to move? Of course, but it must be taken into account that when manipulating the 3d model there is a continuous recalculation of geometry and therefore a flexible assembly not necessary consumes unnecessary resources.

if you have just approached solidwork I recommend you do the internal tutorials to understand the logic
 
depends on what you have to get.
in solidworks the axieme is a group of two or more parts*; These parts can be static among themselves, for example a bolt (of course in reality the nut would rotate, but it does not make sense to do it in a 3d) or furniture, for example a cylinder.
the axieme that contains these parts when inserted into a top-level assembly becomes a monolithic element therefore, in the case of the cylinder they will not be able to move. if instead it is necessary that the cylinder can move to check the operation then it is necessary to set its set as flexible.
can the axioms that do not need to move? Of course, but it must be taken into account that when manipulating the 3d model there is a continuous recalculation of geometry and therefore a flexible assembly not necessary consumes unnecessary resources.

if you have just approached solidwork I recommend you do the internal tutorials to understand the logic
Sorry, I forgot to answer.
Yes yes, after 20 days of full immersion I began to understand a little the philosophy of solidworks.
I find it very intuitive, very user friendly.
in all honesty, however, for speed of modeling and stability, at the moment I regret so much creo.
but it is also true that, being 25 years against 1 month, it could not be different
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top