• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

multibody,iassembly,ipart,etc

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninfh
  • Start date Start date

ninfh

Guest
Good evening,

cause change supplier I have to reorganize some simple projects and speaking with a colleague we have doubted what is the most convenient method to achieve them.
These are simple composite beams and tie rods (a dozen components) to be coupled and milled for some workmanship (length-derived jobs), so far the thing was managed with only one general table and a table of quotas for processing according to the overall length of the finished beam, solution "race" but fast and simple.

the new supplier does not accept a single table but needs all the pieces with different coordinates.

and here arises doubt, according to you which is the most 'comfort' and/or rapid method (please tell the supplier not to break the assholes)?

My colleague insists on making iparts with all the eligible measures, I being lazy in the soul and having no time to stand behind I would prefer to make a sketch of the section of the finite and multibody beam.

how would you achieve it?
 
I'd have to do it myself, i-part and i-assembly.
I want to do a more tireless job but more challenging I would approach i-logic.

Hi.
 
quoted as above, I think iparts and iassembly are the best solution, require more preparation time but make the job better and faster, the evaluation to do is, the time you will use to do it with these functions will be spared in the future?
 
thanks for the answers,
Actually, I was hoping to find some excuses to avoid having to set up all ipart tables and assembly combinations on iassembly, most of the data would also have already 'available, sin that they are written manually in tables in the various cartillas (they were made on autocad 7-8 years ago I think).... I'd rather take the desk to test than spend a week copying figures for a job that, basically, is useless. with the previous supplier these were components that were simply ordered as n°tot travi model xx measure yy and the processing quotas in the cartiglio were all derived from yy.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top