Sergio_V
Guest
Good evening, I am at the choice of my second job... I am actually fleeing from the first leg raised: eek: ...to make it brief,typical Italian situation in which a "student" graduate is found: owner who promises brilliant insertion paths with gradual growth of skills but that after about 8 months tells you that you have no space/future as a designer because it vige nepotism/nonnism (there are the first jealous women in technical office)..and suddenly without even knowing how.. instead of starting to make some calculations on the bearings (always under supervision), as promised previously, from the designer you find to turn here and there for the suppliers (style courier) and to press or to fill out paperwork in which the most professionalizing thing is to know the position on google maps and the economic reach of a company 
, to send us the cv maybe ..comunque.mi .
I had the opportunity to make a series of interviews (3 for precision), all went to good end, all and 3 realities made me a good impression (and in which I intend to stay long term).But I'm afraid to fall in the same trap.... I'm tired of making the same mistakes, so I turn to your experience.
-a reality of about 130 employees (11 people in technical office dealing with mechanics). the company designs laminate processing plants, produces and assembles all internally (workshop and surface treatments), except for thermal treatments. the impression was excellent, the reality seems very structured (the average reality closer to the big company than to the small). in the interview they asked me a series of questions about the hypothetical functioning of a group (what are the various elements and what they serve), a simple sizing on an element of the group itself.
- a reality of 100 employees (9 between mechanical and expert in engineering) , the same speech for production/assembly (thermal and superficial treatment for external companies). the company is operating in the metal processing machine industry (fresatura/tornitura etc.), although in fact the types of machines that produce are more or less always the same. there was no real technical interview (the focus was more motivational). the company seemed a little less structured and closer to a small reality (with its pros and cons). I felt honest and human from a character point of view (they openly spoke of some internal problems/efficiency ), I appreciated the thing since they could avoid saying it, pulling water to their mill.
- a design study with about 16 engineers (if I know the reality of the company that of pure technical studies I am unaware that I can't say... they don't seem mascalzoni but maybe I would have less space and I could do less career).
Assuming that whatever will be my choice, on the paper I would most likely improve and predict that all seemed to me excellent realities (he was breathing air of professionalism :biggrin: )... if you were in my place... to maximize my skills baggage. ..what would you choose, or better what should I base my choice? I suppose that the vision of those who have been working for years in companies is much far more far-sighted than I have been working for months and are still very confident in humanity... so what do you recommend to a colleague in the desperate search for a job that gives him satisfaction and who is ready to give 1000% with passion and dedication :redface:?
Thank you very much for the answers
, to send us the cv maybe ..comunque.mi .I had the opportunity to make a series of interviews (3 for precision), all went to good end, all and 3 realities made me a good impression (and in which I intend to stay long term).But I'm afraid to fall in the same trap.... I'm tired of making the same mistakes, so I turn to your experience.
-a reality of about 130 employees (11 people in technical office dealing with mechanics). the company designs laminate processing plants, produces and assembles all internally (workshop and surface treatments), except for thermal treatments. the impression was excellent, the reality seems very structured (the average reality closer to the big company than to the small). in the interview they asked me a series of questions about the hypothetical functioning of a group (what are the various elements and what they serve), a simple sizing on an element of the group itself.
- a reality of 100 employees (9 between mechanical and expert in engineering) , the same speech for production/assembly (thermal and superficial treatment for external companies). the company is operating in the metal processing machine industry (fresatura/tornitura etc.), although in fact the types of machines that produce are more or less always the same. there was no real technical interview (the focus was more motivational). the company seemed a little less structured and closer to a small reality (with its pros and cons). I felt honest and human from a character point of view (they openly spoke of some internal problems/efficiency ), I appreciated the thing since they could avoid saying it, pulling water to their mill.
- a design study with about 16 engineers (if I know the reality of the company that of pure technical studies I am unaware that I can't say... they don't seem mascalzoni but maybe I would have less space and I could do less career).
Assuming that whatever will be my choice, on the paper I would most likely improve and predict that all seemed to me excellent realities (he was breathing air of professionalism :biggrin: )... if you were in my place... to maximize my skills baggage. ..what would you choose, or better what should I base my choice? I suppose that the vision of those who have been working for years in companies is much far more far-sighted than I have been working for months and are still very confident in humanity... so what do you recommend to a colleague in the desperate search for a job that gives him satisfaction and who is ready to give 1000% with passion and dedication :redface:?
Thank you very much for the answers
