gfrank
Guest
the news of the 2015 version:http://www.autodesk.com/products/au...eatures/architectural-design/new/gallery-viewreally disappointing!
Anchorage
Guest
the impression is that software development is slowing down version in version.
users from all over the globe now say where there are shortcomings and where
there would be to improve but car d has the ears closed for too long.
by reading online there are comments on 2015 negatives and are not few
the disappointments and disappointments of unsatisfied professionals who begin to think beyond
renew the sub also if necessary to switch to competition.
users from all over the globe now say where there are shortcomings and where
there would be to improve but car d has the ears closed for too long.
by reading online there are comments on 2015 negatives and are not few
the disappointments and disappointments of unsatisfied professionals who begin to think beyond
renew the sub also if necessary to switch to competition.
alpearchitetto
Guest
if I have to pay 1300 euros for a sub renewal where the only news is the graphic representation "hand free" really seems to me a theft, considered as with 3ds max you can already do it. the doubt is just what car does not want to invest in rac, at least according to what you see.
gfrank
Guest
in reality, reading in the various sites (in English translated with google) it seems that a big improvement was made in the "motor" of the sw, where (I say it with my words) the "processions" that were made on individual elements equal (so repeated n times from the motor) now are "brased" for "type" of univocal element ... (I am used only by motor
less
In this sense, some say that now "the engine is old" and did not adapt to the evolution of the hardware (e.g. the use of multicores), so the above update is a "saving" to maintain the "acceptable" performance.
others complain that the development of controls (facing), are now only entrusted to external programmers with bees (the famous apps).
in fact they have improved integrations with the addesk servers (a360), where the use of applications in "remote" has an increase in costs ...
I personally reply that adask, after autocad, was not able to invent something new, it was limited to buying nascent sw that others had launched on the market, and over time many were ... abandoned ...
lessIn this sense, some say that now "the engine is old" and did not adapt to the evolution of the hardware (e.g. the use of multicores), so the above update is a "saving" to maintain the "acceptable" performance.
others complain that the development of controls (facing), are now only entrusted to external programmers with bees (the famous apps).
in fact they have improved integrations with the addesk servers (a360), where the use of applications in "remote" has an increase in costs ...
I personally reply that adask, after autocad, was not able to invent something new, it was limited to buying nascent sw that others had launched on the market, and over time many were ... abandoned ...
gfrank
Guest
with the new "rules" of the subs, it is no longer guaranteed that...http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/index?siteid=123112&id=7942019