thiene
Guest
Greetings to everyone!
according to you is very poor this graphics card to turn decently proe 5 on a notebook?
according to you is very poor this graphics card to turn decently proe 5 on a notebook?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
maxopus
Guest
It's a question of open gl drivers.
the only certified or declared cards compatible with ptc are the nvidia framework and the fire gl wings (it also seems to me the fire pro).
with the others is a tern to the lot, in the sense that it can go well or not.
the only certified or declared cards compatible with ptc are the nvidia framework and the fire gl wings (it also seems to me the fire pro).
with the others is a tern to the lot, in the sense that it can go well or not.
riccardot5765
Guest
I'm sorry, but it's not like that. from a hw point of view the picture cards and the geforce are practically equal, apart from very small differences. the most important part lies in the sw, especially in the driver more yet than in the firmware.
the driver of a picture is specifically developed and optimized to integrate with the opengl libraries used in the professional field, compared to the directx used in video games. the result is that with a picture you can squeeze the cad at best. the remarkable price difference is therefore due to the development of sw, at superior quality, to customer support and finally remains the fact that they are recommended for professional sw.
I write this to you because many times I feel a picture who knows that you think you have.
Besides the fact that it is only the declared compatible does not mean that the others do not work, only that at the same parameters you will not get the maximum.
I only add one last thing. time, when a friend told me it's a difference and you don't want to believe it, I started looking a bit on the internet. Besides finding confirmation of the fact, I also found an American site explaining how to change the normal video cards on the sw side to get the picture performance.
the driver of a picture is specifically developed and optimized to integrate with the opengl libraries used in the professional field, compared to the directx used in video games. the result is that with a picture you can squeeze the cad at best. the remarkable price difference is therefore due to the development of sw, at superior quality, to customer support and finally remains the fact that they are recommended for professional sw.
I write this to you because many times I feel a picture who knows that you think you have.
Besides the fact that it is only the declared compatible does not mean that the others do not work, only that at the same parameters you will not get the maximum.
I only add one last thing. time, when a friend told me it's a difference and you don't want to believe it, I started looking a bit on the internet. Besides finding confirmation of the fact, I also found an American site explaining how to change the normal video cards on the sw side to get the picture performance.
Trotto@81
Guest
I confirm everything, and add that on linux with an old geforce 8600 gt and official nvidia driver turns divinely, and I assure you that the graphics under the penguin is a delicate thing.I'm sorry, but it's not like that. from a hw point of view the picture cards and the geforce are practically equal, apart from very small differences. the most important part lies in the sw, especially in the driver more yet than in the firmware.
the driver of a picture is specifically developed and optimized to integrate with the opengl libraries used in the professional field, compared to the directx used in video games. the result is that with a picture you can squeeze the cad at best. the remarkable price difference is therefore due to the development of sw, at superior quality, to customer support and finally remains the fact that they are recommended for professional sw.
I write this to you because many times I feel a picture who knows that you think you have.
Besides the fact that it is only the declared compatible does not mean that the others do not work, only that at the same parameters you will not get the maximum.
I only add one last thing. time, when a friend told me it's a difference and you don't want to believe it, I started looking a bit on the internet. Besides finding confirmation of the fact, I also found an American site explaining how to change the normal video cards on the sw side to get the picture performance.
maxopus
Guest
do as it seems more appropriate.
if I spend something like 10,000 euros between hardware and non-risk software with uncertified cards to save 200-300 euros.
if I spend something like 10,000 euros between hardware and non-risk software with uncertified cards to save 200-300 euros.
riccardot5765
Guest
on this you are perfectly right and in fact I think nobody does it, even if the price difference is not exactly the one indicated.do as it seems more appropriate.
if I spend something like 10,000 euros between hardware and non-risk software with uncertified cards to save 200-300 euros.
he had only asked if proe could go with that video card, which maybe he already has on a pc. It is simply not a terno to the lot, but it is not among the certified cards for proe. In short, it would not respect those that would be system requirements, but it does not mean that it would not work.
cacciatorino
Guest
on linux there is no difference between painting and geforce; on windows the drivers are developed differently, like hardware, so the difference is.I confirm everything, and add that on linux with an old geforce 8600 gt and official nvidia driver turns divinely, and I assure you that the graphics under the penguin is a delicate thing.
cacciatorino
Guest
Sometimes with geforce you have strange problems, like surfaces that you can't see anymore, cursor that disappears, previews that don't work... but it can also go well, the thing is unpredictable. It's a lot tern, as maxopus said, and actually save 200 euros after you spent 6000 licenses is a little crazy... .I'm sorry, but it's not like that. from a hw point of view the picture cards and the geforce are practically equal, apart from very small differences. the most important part lies in the sw, especially in the driver more yet than in the firmware.
the driver of a picture is specifically developed and optimized to integrate with the opengl libraries used in the professional field, compared to the directx used in video games. the result is that with a picture you can squeeze the cad at best. the remarkable price difference is therefore due to the development of sw, at superior quality, to customer support and finally remains the fact that they are recommended for professional sw.
I write this to you because many times I feel a picture who knows that you think you have.
Besides the fact that it is only the declared compatible does not mean that the others do not work, only that at the same parameters you will not get the maximum.
Trotto@81
Guest
It is normal that a professional chooses the picture or firegl, have drivers developed for professional applications, so greater compatibility and less problems with relative time losses.
years ago for problems in displaying with autocad I turned a geforce into picture with the only firmware flash, installed the drivers all worked great.
years ago for problems in displaying with autocad I turned a geforce into picture with the only firmware flash, installed the drivers all worked great.
m_m
Guest
Bye to all,
I have installed wf 4.0 on a pc with geforce 315 (processor i3) and had no particular problems even if I did not thoroughly test (it is my personal pc).
from a couple of weeks I use a 4500 fx picture bought on ebay to 80 euros and, despite the age, is definitely another world.
if someone is interested in the performance indices of windows 7 "video cards" and "graphic games" have passed from the original 4.8 and 5.9 of the geforce respectively to 5.9 and 5.5 (4.8 without additional power) with the picture.
I don't know if the mobile series is worth the same speech.
I have installed wf 4.0 on a pc with geforce 315 (processor i3) and had no particular problems even if I did not thoroughly test (it is my personal pc).
from a couple of weeks I use a 4500 fx picture bought on ebay to 80 euros and, despite the age, is definitely another world.
if someone is interested in the performance indices of windows 7 "video cards" and "graphic games" have passed from the original 4.8 and 5.9 of the geforce respectively to 5.9 and 5.5 (4.8 without additional power) with the picture.
I don't know if the mobile series is worth the same speech.
re_solidworks
Guest
see so much difference in notebooks. If you try a serious mobile workstation of portable consumers you no longer want to see it to make graphics.Bye to all,
I have installed wf 4.0 on a pc with geforce 315 (processor i3) and had no particular problems even if I did not thoroughly test (it is my personal pc).
from a couple of weeks I use a 4500 fx picture bought on ebay to 80 euros and, despite the age, is definitely another world.
if someone is interested in the performance indices of windows 7 "video cards" and "graphic games" have passed from the original 4.8 and 5.9 of the geforce respectively to 5.9 and 5.5 (4.8 without additional power) with the picture.
I don't know if the mobile series is worth the same speech.
all in the professional laptop is designed for heavy and intense use, therefore you find more effective cooling systems, anti-reflective monitor with resolutions suitable for cad, certified video cards, possibility to mount more hard disks also in raid mode, and an excellent possibility of customization of pc components.
ge force I used a lot of them and you have to take the right drivers. The last time I took one, after a long time, I was burned and I guess I don't take any more for the cad.
by now on ebay you find picture, even new, at prices ragged and also private non-professional can afford an excellent picture fx 1700 or 1800 new without spending important figures.
often there are 3500 fx under 100 euros.
Trotto@81
Guest
What do you mean by another world?Bye to all,
I have installed wf 4.0 on a pc with geforce 315 (processor i3) and had no particular problems even if I did not thoroughly test (it is my personal pc).
from a couple of weeks I use a 4500 fx picture bought on ebay to 80 euros and, despite the age, is definitely another world.
if someone is interested in the performance indices of windows 7 "video cards" and "graphic games" have passed from the original 4.8 and 5.9 of the geforce respectively to 5.9 and 5.5 (4.8 without additional power) with the picture.
I don't know if the mobile series is worth the same speech.
the performance index of windows I don't think it matters much to a professional.
m_m
Guest
I mean, for example, visualization is more fluid with axiemi, especially if it is razorized.
the index is a measure and as such should be evaluated. if then it is not significant and there are other numbers that better express the performance of a srei card happy to know them!
I joined this community to learn something from professionals. .
the index is a measure and as such should be evaluated. if then it is not significant and there are other numbers that better express the performance of a srei card happy to know them!
I joined this community to learn something from professionals. .
Trotto@81
Guest
Now you have explained yourself well!!
It is normal to go better with the drivers of the picture (the hardware is very trivial, identical to the geforce), what you pay extra is the development of the dedicated drivers, which is not little.
It is normal to go better with the drivers of the picture (the hardware is very trivial, identical to the geforce), what you pay extra is the development of the dedicated drivers, which is not little.