obtain internal volume of a part.

[eboss]

hi would need to quickly calculate the internal volume, leaving knows a part.
I now attach an example, a piece that looks like a phone cuckold, hypothesize that I have to get the volume in it.
Any ideas?
I hope I explained. (I tried with matching working in the environment part and subtending it to a cube...if they dissect I see the volume but I can not quantify it. . . )

I am currently using swx2012.

 

[Ivan1990]

hi would need to quickly calculate the internal volume, leaving knows a part.
I now attach an example, a piece that looks like a phone cuckold, hypothesize that I have to get the volume in it.
Any ideas?
I hope I explained. (I tried with matching working in the environment part and subtending it to a cube...if they dissect I see the volume but I can not quantify it. . . )

I am currently using swx2012.

to know the volume you have to have 2 separate bodies 1 will be the global one and other what you want to know the volume, done this, just do mass propitiage by selecting only the body you want to know the data, and do recalculate.

 

[eboss]

can be that I have to do it for a part shaped by solidworks or imported. . .
What do you mean? how do I get two bodies so I have the internal volume that I care about its value?

Thank you.

 

[Ivan1990]

can be that I have to do it for a part shaped by solidworks or imported. . .
What do you mean? how do I get two bodies so I have the internal volume that I care about its value?

Thank you.

the command you need is called mass property, and gives you various data including volume, it is in evaluating this command and analyzes or all part or individual bodies, so if you want to have the volume of an object you have to make so that it is seen as a separate body from the rest of the part.
example in your image you have a cube with dug a form (I don't know how much excavated) if you dig it to the bottom you will have two bodies, mass propitize select only what you want to evaluate and the game is done, if you do not dig it to the bottom, you could for example convert the entities of the phone to a sketch on the surface, then extrude it until the end of the excavation by removing the unconscious flag result, you will get a new body.

 

[eboss]

I was referring to how you would get a body that represents the inside of the tel.
This is an example but it could be a change box where I have to calculate how much oil there is or the volume of the soul to get a fusion.
the image you see I obtained by importing another part ->abbina->sottrai.
actually inside the part that looks like a cube I get the volume that represents the inside of my phone but I can't see it because in reality the body after "abbina" remains only one.

 

[Ivan1990]

I was referring to how you would get a body that represents the inside of the tel.
This is an example but it could be a change box where I have to calculate how much oil there is or the volume of the soul to get a fusion.
the image you see I obtained by importing another part ->abbina->sottrai.
actually inside the part that looks like a cube I get the volume that represents the inside of my phone but I can't see it because in reality the body after "abbina" remains only one.

Sorry I didn't download the part. I've solved it so fast

p.s view configurations

 

[controllofiamma]

evaluate the volume of the cube before excavating it and remove the value of the cube dug (with the calculator).

 

[eboss]

as also suggested in some way one arranges, in fact as first solution I used (difference of volumes), what I asked myself and if someone has ever had the same need, and know how it faced it to get a result maybe even usable with configured parts... so always get the value of that internal volume (soul).

 

[Ivan1990]

as also suggested in some way one arranges, in fact as first solution I used (difference of volumes), what I asked myself and if someone has ever had the same need, and know how it faced it to get a result maybe even usable with configured parts... so always get the value of that internal volume (soul).

the only way is getting the internal solid, there are various ways to do it.

 

[Oldwarper]

do a set and instead of using the matching command (valid only for parts) use the cavity command. do the axieme containing the part, do another part (a cube) in the axieme, perform cavities by subtracting your part from the cube and you will get the cube from which the part has been removed.
She's already spoken qui, qui e qui.

 

[eboss]

I had already found this article in research
I get the cube with inside the soul that I would like to get as a body, if then I open that part that in the previous discussion "cubo" and insert an equal going through it pairs to subtract it, I get the body identical to my starting part.. I don't understand. I feel like I've been following the directions, but I don't get what I want, you know where I'm wrong?
I'll give you the example I tried. . .

 

[Ivan1990]

I had already found this article in research
I get the cube with inside the soul that I would like to get as a body, if then I open that part that in the previous discussion "cubo" and insert an equal going through it pairs to subtract it, I get the body identical to my starting part.. I don't understand. I feel like I've been following the directions, but I don't get what I want, you know where I'm wrong?
I'll give you the example I tried. . .

what you have to do at the theoretical level is to create a body with the characteristics of the internal volume you want to calculate, so the purpose of these functions is to make you do this solid using the already existing empty part geometries, so you save time, to make this you have to take your bigger cube of the emptied solid, and to subtract or make the body cavity emptied with the cube, and eventually to get the two bodies(1 must be the other volume of which you will find the body. to do this you have to get 2 bodies at the end of the function to get two bodies you have to ensure that when carrying out the subtraction remain 2 solids divided, then the solution is to close the open parts as if you put a cap. (excuse the papardella but I wanted you to understand everything.) getting 2 bodies you can delete 1 (what remains outside).

 

[eboss]

I thought it wasn't necessary but in fact doing so, it was continuity. . .

Thank you very much.. .

 

[Mike1967]

I thought it wasn't necessary but in fact doing so, it was continuity. . .

Thank you very much.. .

...heemmm... I wrote it in the post... that I immediately deleted... because I thought I misunderstood:redface:

Hi.

 

[Ivan1990]

I thought it wasn't necessary but in fact doing so, it was continuity. . .

Thank you very much.. .

it is not necessary only if you do so that the cube from which internal revenues of the volume does not exceed the open cavities, but it is not worth :biggrin::finger: