opinions on technological quotation for turning (verification)

[mcbramby]

so I would contravere to the indication of my professor who anticipates an addition of material on site

Holy shit... then do not read, I have just explained how to make the hole and how to create a quota....... and you go back to the material to add............... you do not have to add anything if there is no material.
you have to do the hole and just . . . . try it in your model.
If not you can ask , but you will see that you can do it without adding material ............... I don't know where your prof learned how to use cat............ but that solution does not make sense he created material x create the support of the hole, but if he already has the plan it is enough x to make the hole........ Perhaps he has never tried to drill on the floor, no one has ever told him . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 

[mcbramby]

but under the threaded holes did you create material there???? and you didn't use the matrix to make the other hole?? ? ?

 

[meccanicamg]

so I would contravere to the indication of my professor who anticipates an addition of material on site

but what should you add?
Is someone embryonic?

 

[marcoevolution]

Holy shit... then do not read, I have just explained how to make the hole and how to create a quota....... and you go back to the material to add............... you do not have to add anything if there is no material.
you have to do the hole and just . . . . try it in your model.
If not you can ask , but you will see that you can do it without adding material ............... I don't know where your prof learned how to use cat............ but that solution does not make sense he created material x create the support of the hole, but if he already has the plan it is enough x to make the hole........ Perhaps he has never tried to drill on the floor, no one has ever told him . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

for the last time: all the methods you have patiently and meticulously described are right and among the many, that of defining the drilling axis on a curved surface, I have done it also without problems but there is a question that rightly for you is insignificant, for me I miss for nothing: the professor wants me to do this and being he who corrects this devil of cursed examination... I do as he says; is it wrong? Is it crazy? is it useless? I know and I am grateful to you for explaining more than once why, but I want to have these 6cfu cabbages of this ergo exam: what he says I do
In this way I realize that I cannot ask for the help of someone except my prof for doubts or clarifications on this method, but the post was designed to search for the most disparate errors (which I understood and to which I am trying to remedy even if some skeptical thinks that it does not read 30 times every message to not let me escape anything): of catia I have been given the basics as cooking procedures: es drafting: this is how and so the views appear; so and so the odds appear.... good work!

this involves long times to understand you what you are communicating to the actual mastery of the concept

 

[marcoevolution]

but under the threaded holes did you create material there???? and you didn't use the matrix to make the other hole?? ? ?

exact

 

[mcbramby]

for the last time: all the methods you have patiently and meticulously described are right and among the many, that of defining the drilling axis on a curved surface, I have done it also without problems but there is a question that rightly for you is insignificant, for me I miss for nothing: the professor wants me to do this and being he who corrects this devil of cursed examination... I do as he says; is it wrong? Is it crazy? is it useless? I know and I am grateful to you for explaining more than once why, but I want to have these 6cfu cabbages of this ergo exam: what he says I do
In this way I realize that I cannot ask for the help of someone except my prof for doubts or clarifications on this method, but the post was designed to search for the most disparate errors (which I understood and to which I am trying to remedy even if some skeptical thinks that it does not read 30 times every message to not let me escape anything): of catia I have been given the basics as cooking procedures: es drafting: this is how and so the views appear; so and so the odds appear.... good work!

this involves long times to understand you what you are communicating to the actual mastery of the concept

If it makes you use catia you use catia properly.................. otherwise draws as it is equal......
If he wants you to use catia he must be able to explain it to you..................... If he doesn't know how to use it, it's better if he lets you use the tecnigraph ................... .

 

[mcbramby]

cmq let us know how the exam will end............ now we're ticking for you