pack&go, delete files

[Geppetto82]

Hello, everyone.
I have the need to move all the parts and assemblies of my project to another folder and delete old rows (type "talgia and paste").
I thought in the pack&go function there was this option somewhere, but nothing.
How could I do that?
use sw11 1.0
thanks to all
greetings
geppetto82

 

[meccanicamg]

Hello, everyone.
I have the need to move all the parts and assemblies of my project to another folder and delete old rows (type "talgia and paste").
I thought in the pack&go function there was this option somewhere, but nothing.
How could I do that?
use sw11 1.0
thanks to all
greetings
geppetto82

the size and paste you do it from windows. the pack & go serves to duplicate projects or to extract an entire project consisting of files taken in different allocations/folders.

It's a manina! !

 

[Pablo]

sin, I too would like this function....
could not insert in the p&g window a caselline to flag with written "delete files from the original location", evntually with a warning-confirm message.... ? ?

 

[meccanicamg]

sin, I too would like this function....
could not insert in the p&g window a caselline to flag with written "delete files from the original location", evntually with a warning-confirm message.... ? ?

no because some files, like those "standdards" that you use from custom library should be deleted and instead are used in sharing with other projects. It would make no sense and huge damage would be created:finger:

 

[Geppetto82]

you're right mechanicm I didn't think about the commercial components.....
you could obvious having a window the distinct base of the axieme to move and go fleggare the components to delete!
is faster so that manually go folder by folder to delete parts....
you who are more experienced than me, doesn't it seem a little laborious? ? ?

 

[Oldwarper]

I have a "brutal" method, but it requires a file manager that is not windows (use total commander, for decades now...) to erase all obsolete files.
I open the axieme (strictly not light weight) in swx and I go to delete all the files of part of the axieme. open files in theassieme sonil file manager asks me what to do for blocked files. seleziono neglects all and those unblocked are deleted, while others are eliminated. You can do it with explorer but I don't know how to behave (I hate it and never use it), I think you have to say every time you ignore it.

Of course there must be only the files of the axieme in the folder, otherwise it will erase all the others who are not open in that swx session.

It's such a laborious method (and I don't escape from risks) that I don't make it so often.

 

[cacciatorino]

But is it my impression or swx-explorer castrated to convince you that you can't do without pdm? at least if compared to systems provided with other cad...

 

[Geppetto82]

But is it my impression or swx-explorer castrated to convince you that you can't do without pdm? at least if compared to systems provided with other cad...

I would not be surprised if it were so at this point....

 

[Pablo]

a doubt: but when I pay, should it not ignore the suspended components of the axieme? Do you have to deflate them one by one?? ? ...if I want to send my client only part of the aid, do I have to go crazy every time? or did I miss some work on the street?? !

 

[SolidUser]

But is it my impression or swx-explorer castrated to convince you that you can't do without pdm? at least if compared to systems provided with other cad...

I don't think so.
If so, they wouldn't have in the basic version so many environments.
- modeling
- surfaces
- sheet metal
- welding
- molds
- a little rendering
- animation
- put to the table
- etc.

as in the upper version of the base there is pdmworks, it is useless to develop a tool that would have the features more than a pdm than a file manager.

users of if instead not having a pdm born especially for solid edge, have a revision manager that acts a bit like pdm.

 

[cacciatorino]

as in the upper version of the base there is pdmworks, it is useless to develop a tool that would have the features more than a pdm than a file manager.

but then the pdms must also be implemented: databases, users, passwords, backups, etc., a nice rupture of boxes and a nice padlock to the collaboration with external.... much better a tool like rm that does what it has to do by limiting itself to managing the links sufficiently.

 

[cacciatorino]

users of if instead not having a pdm born especially for solid edge, have a revision manager that acts a bit like pdm.

I don't know but I think he does that job, but it only works on sharepoint databases, for a fee. Luckily, rm is still in the base version.

 

[SolidUser]

I don't know but I think he does that job, but it only works on sharepoint databases, for a fee. Luckily, rm is still in the base version.

In fact, share point is even more complicated than configuring pdmworks.

 

[SolidUser]

but then the pdms must also be implemented: databases, users, passwords, backups, etc., a nice rupture of boxes and a nice padlock to the collaboration with external.... much better a tool like rm that does what it has to do by limiting itself to managing the links sufficiently.

It is true that it must be configured, but pdmworks is quite simple.
I don't know what you mean.
If you want to have common projects to work on and a common database, then you have to go to something serious as enterprisepdm.
if you want to give files, the scan-out of the files becomes local and then I am extracted from the vault.

my advice however is to use a pdm when you are already more than one.
management of files, revisions, references, etc.. should not be done with stratagems or with binding methods.

There was a period where we passed to 3d and it was a slaughterhouse.
each codified, renamed, moved... as it believed logical.
The troubles were difficult to solve and took away a long time.
with the advent of the pdm, it was a relief.
Sincerely now as I would not give up pdm.

 

[cacciatorino]

I don't know what you mean.

I work as an external collaborator for mechanical plant production companies. with all those who have the pdm exchange the files is always complicated and from headaches, and in the end the only feasible solution becomes to buy the same cad and the same pdm of the customer, that if customers become 5 or 6 means to go to work only to pay the maintenance installments.

 

[SolidUser]

I work as an external collaborator for mechanical plant production companies. with all those who have the pdm exchange the files is always complicated and from headaches, and in the end the only feasible solution becomes to buy the same cad and the same pdm of the customer, that if customers become 5 or 6 means to go to work only to pay the maintenance installments.

problems are 2 :
1) different
2) different pdm
solution :
1) have a standard cad as od (opendocument) :biggrin::biggrin:
2) the briefcase is a tool that many pdms have, but unfortunately few cad managers know or know how to use/configure and contribute to the exchange of projects and relative return between the customer and the collaborators.
for example solidworks pdms have it, teamcenter has it, enovia as well.

 

[cacciatorino]

2) the briefcase is a tool that many pdms have, but unfortunately few cad managers know or know how to use/configure and contribute to the exchange of projects and relative return between the customer and the collaborators.
.

but if I am given a set in briefcases (a group of a machine), then at the end of the company all the components of the group are blocked and therefore they cannot work there (meaning also those who have given me but do not need to change)?

If so, it's not useful, then better work via vpn on the remote db at the customer and operate on the local file system, and the night synchronize the modified files (models and tables).

 

[SolidUser]

but if I am given a set in briefcases (a group of a machine), then at the end of the company all the components of the group are blocked and therefore they cannot work there (meaning also those who have given me but do not need to change)?

That's right.
or I work there or you work there.
If I add a hole or change a fold, you cannot change the fold because you want it higher.
even where we work who changes a file, becomes the owner of the same and nobody can edit it.
so also happens with our management.
If I'm reviewing a bom, no one can change it.
He will do it when I am finished (today or in a month).

 

[cacciatorino]

That's right.
or I work there or you work there.

Then it's not okay. Most often the works consist of modifying an existing group to make it a similar new one, but the components are shared on other 150 different groups, and they cannot be stuck a month to wait for me to stay back the group of 80 components of which I had to change 4 or 5 but while keeping all the other 76 or 75 blocked. I have to call what sold me the briefcase as a solution to the problem.....

 

[SolidUser]

Then it's not okay. Most often the works consist of modifying an existing group to make it a similar new one, but the components are shared on other 150 different groups, and they cannot be stuck a month to wait for me to stay back the group of 80 components of which I had to change 4 or 5 but while keeping all the other 76 or 75 blocked. I have to call what sold me the briefcase as a solution to the problem.....

or a priori you know what will be edited and select only those that will go in checked-out and leave the other part of the intact files or mandi in checked-out all.
there is no other solution except with a shared database and therefore the same pdm.

having the wife drunk and the full barrel is very hard.