It's just like that! I realized now that you have noticed that the table is taken from the configuration of "default" instead of that "pallinatura" I use to ball the assemblies... a nice casino but the table does not automatically update... you always have to put it back if you change the view configuration at the table... .then the effective solution is only one: the company must be provided with a trusted assistance to use and to which, if necessary, the files can be sent. I'm sorry, but the problems you see seem impossible. The only thing that comes to my mind is that there are messing up with configurations. of the type that the table refers to one configuration and views to another, I do not find any other explanations.
you can select and change the configuration of the separate at any time. Of course only who design can decide what configurations to use and automatic changes would be very dangerous. in my opinion the operation is correct so.It's just like that! I realized now that you have noticed that the table is taken from the configuration of "default" instead of that "pallinatura" I use to ball the assemblies... a nice casino but the table does not automatically update... you always have to put it back if you change the view configuration at the table... .
I am not very practical, but only two days of course are very little... I also come from the use of other cadyou can select and change the configuration of the separate at any time. Of course only who design can decide what configurations to use and automatic changes would be very dangerous. in my opinion the operation is correct so.