• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

parti importare solidworks problems 2017

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rich
  • Start date Start date

Rich

Guest
Good morning, everyone.
I'll explain my problem now.
I'm working on big axiems with solidworks 2017 and once I pop up a part imported from the internet (by means of file step) or a set of imported parts, the couplings that concern him pack all and arbitrarily change the bound faces.
Moreover the problem does not occur at the moment, but only when I recover the aid after saving it and closed it.

What can this problem be due to?

specific that the same thing does not happen in case I open the step with inventor, I recognize the functions and then retransform it in step to open it with solidworks. Yet the step is a neutral file, or not?

thank you in advance to those who will help me.
 
Hey, I'll throw them...
have you tried with step 203 and 214? . . .
then test with the parasolid format is the neutral format that approaches solid.

Hi.
 
never happened such a thing

attaching one of these infamous step files could help you understand how they present themselves.
once opened the step file with solid do import diagnostic?
 
Hey, I'll throw them...
have you tried with step 203 and 214? . . .
then test with the parasolid format is the neutral format that approaches solid.

Hi.
step files are imported from the internet (traceparts or vendor sites).
so I cannot choose the type (203 or 204). correct me if I'm wrong.
about parasolid, I will have to search if I can find them in this format.

never happened such a thing

attaching one of these infamous step files could help you understand how they present themselves.
once opened the step file with solid do import diagnostic?
I only do it when it gives me defects in the faces of imported designs.

continue to give me errors on all couplings of imported step files, after recognizing functions.
Now I'm trying to use them without recognizing their functions. for now no problem. Could this be the key to solving the problem?
 
what do you need to recognize the functions of an imported file? weights the files, creates geometries tied to untied sketches and created without constructive criterion and loses a lot of time.
diagnostics must always be done
 
what do you need to recognize the functions of an imported file? weights the files, creates geometries tied to untied sketches and created without constructive criterion and loses a lot of time.
diagnostics must always be done
I tried to do it but there are no differences.
to recognize functions was a superfluous passage. possible that the presence of untied sketches then gives errors on the couplings of the surfaces created by these sketches?

thanks and hello
 
every once in a while, it also happens to us in the u.t. that kick the couplings with solidworks 2016. .
.you don't understand why but it happens with the imported.
therefore always parasolid, diagnose if other formats, do not do pastrugnate and if you can prefer multibody part compared to multi part axieme.

even there are files that click saves and shows you that it saved but reopens and has not saved anything....I have seen each one lately
 
every once in a while, it also happens to us in the u.t. that kick the couplings with solidworks 2016. .
.you don't understand why but it happens with the imported.
therefore always parasolid, diagnose if other formats, do not do pastrugnate and if you can prefer multibody part compared to multi part axieme.

even there are files that click saves and shows you that it saved but reopens and has not saved anything....I have seen each one lately
About the last thing you described, it never happened to me.
about the flattened couplings, yes, it happens on the imported. In fact, I confirm that it happens on the imported ones I have recognized the functions. If I need to change an imported I go to draw over the surfaces, without recognizing its functions and for now I am not having any problems. I think that the problem can really be untied and unquoted sketches that form after the recognition of functions. I solved this way even if it seems like a rough method.

parasolid, I repeat, is not a format that I always find on the internet. While the diagnostics I performed it but did not result.
and then the multi-part assemblies serve me because there must be flexible and therefore mobile subaxis. the multibody part I use it but only in cases where the customer wants only a "photography" of the axieme.

Hi.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top