parts created together

[batstar]

Hello everyone,
the parts created together, (when I can always try to avoid them), always cause me problems in the sense that once you create I am not bound in the axieme and most of the times do not adapt to the varying of the adjacent components that have helped create them. the part and its sketches in the browser have the symbol of adactivity but the same do not update creating multiple errors in the axieme.
in the last case I have to roll out a bottom sheet with a corner connected with sloping banks; in the axieme I put the base sheet, the two sloping banks of 5° on the right sides and I go to create the connecting sheet with a sketch loft from the head of the two banks and as a guide from a sketch on the base sheet with curved elements. all right here, when I go to vary the width or inclination of one of the banks the guide sketch lying on the base sheet does not update by sending in tilt the derivative works.
if someone has some straight allego zip example,
Thank you all!View attachment parteassieme.zip

 

[batstar]

...from the absence of answers I deduce that is an unresolvable problem. very nice for a software from thousands of euros.

 

[Catafratto]

Let's say that basic activity sucks. for your problem there are various solutions, but they are not quick to describe (or at least I don't know how to do it well and quickly). try to search in the sunset forum, similar things have already been treated. However, for example, I would go to the reverse and do a part where I create a driving surface via loft and then with the thickening command I would turn into sheet metal.

 

[batstar]

Let's say that basic activity sucks. for your problem there are various solutions, but they are not quick to describe (or at least I don't know how to do it well and quickly). try to search in the sunset forum, similar things have already been treated. However, for example, I would go to the reverse and do a part where I create a driving surface via loft and then with the thickening command I would turn into sheet metal.

I have done with the command you thicken, but the problem is not in this specific case, it is only an example. in its time when I had autodesk assistance, I placed the problem and advised me to copy in the part the objects of the assemblies as a group of surfaces and go to build the object based on those geometries that should be adaptive.....they should, but often they are not!

 

[Catafratto]

what I do is usually to create a sketch/solid/group of surfaces or combination of the things I call pippo.scheletro and derive it inside the pari/lamiere that must drive. by relying on what is derived you build the pieces you need, to create the axieme you can bind all the pieces to the origin of the skeleton (productivity card) Originally active component does it automatically, or even card productivity> fixed and set component as root if the skeleton is centered on the origin of a subassieme, depends on how you impose the thing). extremely robust system, withstands the changes.

If you really want to use adactivity wait for Lent so do penance and give a greater sense to your sufferings

explained in detail, look for skeletal modeling
http://aucache.autodesk.com/au2012/...assembly modeling techniques master class.pdf
http://blogs.rand.com/files/ma322-2l-a-view-from-the-top.pdf

 

[batstar]

Thanks for the interesting pdf, they are solutions that I have also used, but it is always about methods to bypass a function (which does not work!), like that of the adactivity that is so exalted in the presentations of the software, now I am increasingly convinced that those who compile these software have never used them and makes us "fourth" all the time of the year!