passare da solidworks a inventor

[tanticapelli]

Good morning to all,

I'm sorry if maybe such a discussion has already been dealt with, but panic is attacking me. . .

for problems of costs the boss would want to migrate from solidworks to inventor.. .

place that the sector in which I operate is at the border between the building and the mechanics (iron shoe shop, locks, coatings, various and assorted architectural solutions) what between the two programs is better to use?

Now I'm moving the first steps in inventor but I'm just a software neophyte and I'm terrified by meeting management problems for the most demanding and demanding orders in the case of slowness of the software that can be found. . .

the problem of slowness I have already met him in solidworks and thanks to the "malizie" collected to the right and missing I managed to solve it risking also to wrong of the works.. .

I would not want to take the same risks again with inventor or even worse to discover that the same does not have the necessary flexibility given the "chaotic" sector in which I operate.. .

give me possibly objective news that help me out of this empasse. . .

Thank you.

so many hairs

 

[meccanicamg]

switching from solidworks to inventor is like switching from an engineer to a mechanical expert. all programs do everything. However, inventor with the multibody who did some version can also work benign, while as long as there was only carpentry together it was a disaster. Just do not pay annual renewals and the cost becomes zero. the complete license of inventor provides the possibility to dimensional gear springs and other mechanics. I personally prefer solidworks with the toolbox module, a lot of custom bookcases and kisssoft for mechanical push.

 

[marcof]

for problems of costs the boss would want to migrate from solidworks to inventor.. .

ask your boss if he's done the time-related accounts you'll need to reshape everything you have in solidworks format. I say that you eat the savings on the cost of the three-day license, then it will take a few months to remodel everything (the reuse of native swx files in inventor forget it) and then at the time of pulling the sums will be caxxi.
you passed to catia or nx for reasons related to the improper need to use high-end cads to understand it, but switching from swx to inv or vice versa to me it really laughs. to you instead
will make you cry

 

[Meteor02]

I agree with marcof is a senseless passage and to the long anti-economic being operational with a new software takes months and money in courses if you want to speed up the thing and in the end you have a similar product if nn lower.

 

[re_solidworks]

cheaper inventor... with rental if you stop paying you can not even manipulate your projects anymore.... I would say not very far away as choice!

 

[Gennaro3D]

cheaper inventor... with rental if you stop paying you can not even manipulate your projects anymore.... I would say not very far away as choice!

It's the same reasoning I did to those who want to buy inventor instead of solidw. "because so we save "... without considering that starting from scratch the learning of solidworks would undoubtedly be faster ... boh .. sometimes I think I live in a world overturned ...

 

[Meteor02]

as programs are not so far away, for carpentry I would definitely go on solid, it is more intuitive and already after a first basic course carpentry begins to work with decency.

 

[Gennaro3D]

as programs are not so far away, for carpentry I would definitely go on solid, it is more intuitive and already after a first basic course carpentry begins to work with decency.

I thank you for the answer, I agree with you, but after about ten years in the environment of parametric cads, it seems strange to compare inventor to solidw. , I think a little distance is there, not at all one is the leader for this price range and the other is never taken off (I don't know if it turns out , cmq the cam for inventor is hsm and is perfectly integrated also with solidw. Because it's a solidw software. that autodesk bought and made us the cam for inventor... I think that's enough.

 

[tanticapelli]

Good morning to all, at the end I think I will stay on solidworks... and with satisfaction.

a question about 3d rotation in the field together:

1) on inventor it seems to me that when I zoomed in a particular area of the axieme and I need to do a minimum 3d rotation, I hold pressed f4 and drag with the pressed mouse wheel (and so far everything ok) but the "rotation spin" does not seem to be adaptive to the zoomed that I had done on the particular but rotates on the maximum extension of the axieme so that the wide zoomed radius disappears from the monitor (be).

2) on solidworks instead it seems to me that, if no component is selected (always better to make a click in the vacuum to zero any accidental selections) simply by pressing the wheel and dragging the rotation happens taking into account the zoomed on the particular, although the axieme was considerably broad in terms of extensions.

Is that what you have?

Thank you.

so many hairs