pattern incompleto

[cacciatorino]

in the attached part, osd does not complete the pattern: in the preview it is all right, but then when I confirm the execution of the processing, some instances are lost. in detail: a hole that crosses two wings of a c sheet in the original, ends up crossing only one in the repetitions.

Does anyone want to look at him? osd v17.

Corollary: If I load this part together, can I use its pattern to create shared patterns guided by the pattern itself? In the sense: they place the first roller on the first hole and then I tell him to repeat it automatically as many times as the pattern is numerous.

 

[cacciatorino]

I saw that the first hole (the original) was passing, the others (the repetitions) were blind, I don't know why. then I modified one of the repeated ones, and then with the option "proga a pattern" I corrected the others too.

 

[MFT]

in the attached part, osd does not complete the pattern: in the preview it is all right, but then when I confirm the execution of the processing, some instances are lost. in detail: a hole that crosses two wings of a c sheet in the original, ends up crossing only one in the repetitions.

Does anyone want to look at him? osd v17.

Corollary: If I load this part together, can I use its pattern to create shared patterns guided by the pattern itself? In the sense: they place the first roller on the first hole and then I tell him to repeat it automatically as many times as the pattern is numerous.

You can save me in 16 or 16.5 the second question I know no.

 

[cacciatorino]

You can save me in 16 or 16.5 the second question I know no.

I send you the file in version 16.5, I hope you have not lost info in saving backwards.

 

[MFT]

I send you the file in version 16.5, I hope you have not lost info in saving backwards.

Sorry I didn't remember that I have 16 I don't know if you can save it in this version

 

[cacciatorino]

Sorry I didn't remember that I have 16 I don't know if you can save it in this version

There he is! :smile:

 

[MFT]

There he is! :smile:

ok alright but I don't understand the problem I see the holes on both wings I can't understand what's wrong with her

 

[cacciatorino]

ok alright but I don't understand the problem I see the holes on both wings I can't understand what's wrong with her

Try to make a hole that takes both wings and then make a pattern. What I sent you back is the right one.

I think it's a bug....

 

[MFT]

Try to make a hole that takes both wings and then make a pattern. What I sent you back is the right one.

I think it's a bug....

but a hole with machinig, that I know I have to do it one wing at a time and then in the pattern I make the window that takes me the two holes

 

[Er Presidente]

in the attached part, osd does not complete the pattern: in the preview it is all right, but then when I confirm the execution of the processing, some instances are lost. in detail: a hole that crosses two wings of a c sheet in the original, ends up crossing only one in the repetitions.

Does anyone want to look at him? osd v17.

Corollary: If I load this part together, can I use its pattern to create shared patterns guided by the pattern itself? In the sense: they place the first roller on the first hole and then I tell him to repeat it automatically as many times as the pattern is numerous.

Imported model?

 

[cacciatorino]

but a hole with machinig, that I know I have to do it one wing at a time and then in the pattern I make the window that takes me the two holes

with the 17th you can do it with the depth you want, so that I go and get both wings, maybe with the 16th no. The problem is, then when he does the pattern, he puts it back to "automatic" depth by going to take only one wing of the profile.

 

[giando75]

I'm sorry, but if you use a passing drill?

 

[cacciatorino]

I'm sorry, but if you use a passing drill?

It's been a long time, though:

father processing, with passing hole, is performed correctly. when I generate the pattern, the subsequent repetitions are made by forcing only one wing of the profile. However, it seems to me that he then solved by modifying one of the holes of the pattern by telling him to pass it and giving it the option "proga a pattern".

You practically have to generate the pattern, and you have the error, then by editating it you can correct it. Surely it's a software bug, nothing irreparable anyway.

 

[cacciatorino]

Imported model?

Sorry the delay, no native model osd.

 

[giando75]

ooops, it was 2 months ago, you know you've already solved it!