pdmlink comparison with vault autodesk

[makeng]

in a company where I work currently use for about 8 years inventor . they design and build shop machinery . I have verified that the projects are not bad but they do not even have the manageability that I usually imposed using proes. here then I have cominicato to "rompere" with proe using skeleton and layout. flexible and customizable projects. apart from this they tell me that inventor uses a management program that is called vault. the autodesk dealer is running away not to lose the customer and sold to the property that inventor has the famous skeleton and is equal (now) to proe. Plus it says vault is equivalent if not better at pdm-link. But will it be true? Can someone help me understand what are the real differences between the two project management environments? Is it fair to say they do the same thing?
Thank you.
Mar

 

[maxopus]

... I had to hear only this, from my side it says: "We don't mix wool with silk."
This is like export iges of autocad, make a cone, carry it out and you find half cone.
It's better if I don't say what I think.

 

[makeng]

I imagined... but my problem is that I have to deal with the matter rigorously. I used intralink and I know what it does. never used this vault. I would need arguments to slam in the face to the dishonest retailers (this is when they try to peel wool for silk) and to convite the prune to not miss.
Hi.

 

[maxopus]

are they who must show you that their skeleton works as the aax of creo-pro/e or that their vault works better than pdm-link.
tell us which customers have installed these solutions, then we see the list of the installed ptc and we do 2 laughs.
They are not able to put in place even the normal cut on sheet, now they want to take care of advanced assembly ... but goes to the rats

 

[re_solidworks]

Look, as far as I know, inventor's adaptive technology still suffers from big reliability problems. as you will know, using proe, in these cases reliability is fundamental as you are fond of the cad management of many information.
I recommend a demo of the retailer with the skeletons and make them change to the flight to test its reliability.
If then the axieme becomes complex.... you save who can! I recently opened a somewhat complex set with inventor 2011 and response times are shameful compared to proes or swx for similar axiemes.
For vault... I don't think it's a real pdm, more than a data manager, I think autodesk proposes productstream as a pdm.
pdm link is a valid solution, even for great realities. eye that however does not need the cannon to kill the flies and the small company and with needs not too pushed pdm link could not be the optimal solution.

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

in a company where I work currently use for about 8 years inventor . they design and build shop machinery . I have verified that the projects are not bad but they do not even have the manageability that I usually imposed using proes. here then I have cominicato to "rompere" with proe using skeleton and layout. flexible and customizable projects. apart from this they tell me that inventor uses a management program that is called vault. the autodesk dealer is running away not to lose the customer and sold to the property that inventor has the famous skeleton and is equal (now) to proe. Plus it says vault is equivalent if not better at pdm-link. But will it be true? Can someone help me understand what are the real differences between the two project management environments? Is it fair to say they do the same thing?
Thank you.
Mar

but looking to read certain things really makes me smile, lately they say about those hallucinating things.:smile:
apart from the fact that vault, I would not even consider it a pdm, it is not remotely even paraganable to a scalable plm solution, such as windchill pdmlink which among other things is a web based solution and not client server (as it was intralink to give you an example).
Recently in the various sections of the forum we have discussed a lot, of which functionality offers a plm solution compared to a plm, with the various integrations
ask for example to those of autodesk how they manage files of other non-native cads, or documents of other type not cad, ask how they make to create structures of product different from the engineering bom, respectively manfufacturing bom, if they manage also the electronic part, or the software, or the product documentation.... there are so many differences that if I start to listele I do not end anymore.
I don't even comment...
are available to help you more.

greetings