performance differences between autocad and autocad lt

[FRAGRO]

Hi.
can someone tell me if and what differences in speed and performance can there be for the elaboration of a set of 2d blocks (also 3000) between autocad and autocad lt?
Thank you.

 

[numero1]

I don't think so, at the same version of course.

2000 lt with 2000 full and, e.g.
2006 lt with 2006 full and so on ......

Of course, between 2000 full and 2006 lt, it is probably better 2006 even if lt are blocks only and only 2d.
Wait, maybe someone has + information about me.

Hi.

 

[User1]

that I know the only difference between autocad and autocad lt is that "lt" to limitations on 3d commands, the rest should be all the same!

 

[Tristan]

that I know the only difference between autocad and autocad lt is that "lt" to limitations on 3d commands, the rest should be all the same!

It's not exactly like that...it's not just the 3d part, it's missing more.
However at performance level the calculation engine that is below is the same, so nothing should change

 

[User1]

Thank you, Tristan!

 

[Mone89]

another limitation of thelt is the impossibility of loading raster images.
the basis of the program is the same as tristan said.