performance solidworks 2022

[bradipo666]

hello to everyone, I would need some advice to make sw 2022 better turn on my pc.
I have a non-performance PC (i3 8100 - 8gb ram - igpu) where perfectly turns inventor 2022 even with assemblies from hundreds of details. When I work with solidworks 2022 instead, I can't even manage a set with 5/6 details.... it's an embarrassing slowness!
What can I do? (besides putting a dgpu of course )
I tried to cuff with the settings but the result does not change. .
I understand that the two software are different and that manage resources differently, but it seems a little too unbalanced this difference between the two...
Note: Obviously when I use one of the two, I did not open any other software. . . .

Thank you.​

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

subject treated countless times.
I personally wrote several times how to manage the settings and others did the same.
search in the forum and ask targeted questions because of everything you have written missing all the essential and that is how you manage the files

 

[bradipo666]

I've already done some research, but I've only found discussions 15+ years ago...
I honestly don't know how to manage files in sw...
I come from inventor where I have my folders with parts/assies and project files created by the program.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

impossible that date back to 15 years ago, maybe 5...
logic of management does not change between today and yesterday

I honestly don't know how to manage files in sw

You can see that what you read did not understand because among the many explanations there are those on how to set the settings in the options.
then only you can know how you are managing the job (external references, partimulticoro, single body parts, files on the server or local, etc.).
Did you at least do the internal tutorials? did you do or do you have to do a dedicated course?

 

[bradipo666]

I was referring to the old post on performance options, nn to those on file management.
cmq no multibody. Just single body.
the axieme is a metal structure composed of sheet metal parts, tubular, tubes..
all files are local.
What internal tutorials are you talking about?
no, for now no course

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I was referring to the old post on performance options, nn to those on file management.

Give me the link of the most recent you have read and tell me what is unclear.

cmq no multibody. Just single body.

learn the multibody that is one of the strong points of solidworks.

the axieme is a metal structure composed of sheet metal parts, tubular, tubes..

quresto does not explain anything about how the files are made.
in inventor in any way you make modeling and assembling these elements always have the same performance? a smooth tube, one with 20 holes and one with 100 holes have the same impact on the assembly? a sheet with a fold and one with 10 have the same impact?

What internal tutorials are you talking about?

those you find by pressing the menu "?" and that also indicates google

 

[bradipo666]

I understand... how do I manage a welded set with a multi body? Do I have to draw everything in one file? and how do I manage the distinct materials?
when I have to realize a single detail that will then be worked on lathe or fried it is good the multi body... But in case of welded assemblies, how do you do it?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

all widely discussed. Do some research with my name and find a lot of explanations.
and do the tutorials...... .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

and if you make elements with tubes and other profiles studied the functions of the structural elements (search with google)

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I understand... how do I manage a welded set with a multi body? Do I have to draw everything in one file? and how do I manage the distinct materials?

multibody simulates exactly a welded element.
in solidworks, generally, a file whose components are assembled by means of removable fixings (e.g. screws) and a multibody whose components are joined by non-removable fixings (savings). management is very flexible.
there are two types of stretches: the distinct materials that is used for axiemi and the cutting distinction that is used for multibody.

when I have to realize a single detail that will then be worked on lathe or fried it is good the multi body... But in case of welded assemblies, how do you do it?

See what I said above.
another vantqggio of solidworks are the configurations that allow to have in the same file both the prework version and the one with the processing, in this way with only one file and managing the appropriate functions you can make a design for the crude and one for the machine department.
forget the logic and method of using inventor, otherwise you'll just piss yourself off considering solidworks a bad software when you just work differently

some links

Conoscere solidworks

Buona sera a tutti. Sono nuovo del forum e sono nuovo a solidwork. E' da poco che disegno e piu o meno tutto da autodidatta. Sostanzialmente disegno arredi o parti di arredi di imbarcazioni e soprattutto da circa un annetto e non a tempo pieno. Qualunque consiglio o link è ben accetto....mi son...

www.cad3d.it

https://help.solidworks.com/2018/it...r.htm?id=9094be99ca124d25b93bb9301a573204#pg0

gestione grezzo e poi lavorato

SEI UN GRANDE !! ho capito bene o male tutto quello che mi hai detto e sono riuscito in parte a replicarlo. anche l'esportazione di prt è una cosa comoda e utile. ho solo un dubbio, ma temo in una risposta negativa.. il grezzo che hai fatto te è ok, adesso io devo farne un altro in cui è tutto...

www.cad3d.it

 

[bradipo666]

thanks for the advice.
the problem is that I come from inventor but solidworks has a different workflow that I can not yet understand di

 

[bradipo666]

what I am interested now to understand at large lines is the operation, then I will go specifically with various videos and tutorials. .

- with inventor, I create raw details, then I throw them in a set and do the work. the raw details and then the worked axieme.

- with solidworks, I have to create a single multibody part (sldprt? ), save the bodies in separate files and then manage the processing through configurations?

 

[re_solidworks]

thanks for the advice.
the problem is that I come from inventor but solidworks has a different workflow that I can not yet understand di

to exploit a software you have to know it. to know it you have to document correctly (recourses in the presence, online courses, etc.) and given the amount of arguments to be treated it takes a lot of time for a cad. if you do not document, you just use the new software like the previous one, finding many defects, but without being able to understand the merits.

 

[bradipo666]

Of course, I agree with the fact that you have to document yourself. as I said I will. what I wanted to know was great lines, the workflow for welded assemblies that from what I understood is completely different from inventor
I certainly claim to use solidworks as an inventor....