• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

phase

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilli
  • Start date Start date

gilli

Guest
I have such a composite project:
a-state of fact
b_project status
c-state of comparison
d-variant
I would like to make in the variant state a comparative table in which to display both the yellow and red of the design state and those of variant.
Is that possible?
Thank you.
 
I need it.
project presented in common.
Before the start, the customer asked for a variant.
the executive project for the yard must understand all the changes made, in particular the comparative table of the dem.-cos..
Bye.
 
provided that by revit, the comparative state is not a phase (the chronological state of the project/design) but a "graphic representation" (view) of the changes occurred between two successive phases, the filters applied to phases (work), which are:
- new
- existing
- demolished
- temporary (which is similar to the new + demolished "work" in the same chronological phase)
allow to "represent" (in the drawing) various views contained the combinations between the above mentioned phases of work (with special graphy = graphic replacement) in the time phase (in use) than the previous one.
in your case, the comparative state is the representation (view) of the demolished and built between the state of project (phase in use) and the state of fact (previous phase)
the next time phase from you called "variant" determines, applying (to the variant phase) a representation that can be called "comparated 2" (or as you want) between the variant phase and the project state.
It is therefore not possible to make a "comparation" between three stages simultaneously.
However it is possible to "break" two successive stages.
if you intend to operate as indicated below,duplicate the design/design (save with new name) and use that file.
in your case it is possible, after creating all the views, including the comparisons (1 and 2) to merge the phase (work) "variant" with the "project state" (with the respective views) with which the following graphic representation follows (compared to the fact state) the maintenance of the "comparative" views:
- the building (new), designed both in the design state (compared to the factual state) and in the variant (compared to the design state), is represented in red;
- the demolished, in the state of project (compared to the state of fact) and in the variant (compared to the state of project) but which was also existing in the state of fact, is represented with yellow,
- the demolished, in the variant state (compared to the design state) but which was not existing even in the state of fact, is represented as "temporaneous" (to the new built in the state of project and then demolished in the variant) .
to the same object (represented as temporary) you can apply two overlapping nets with diagonal lines (converse), one yellow and one red (transparent background), which highlight in the same representation and on the same object (e.g. wall) the built and the demolished.

In this way you can print a comparison table between the state of fact, design and variant.

if you want to keep everything in the same project/design (file) instead of making a copy, you have to create six stages of work:
- the first three as above (fact/project/variant), to which you will associate all the views, including the comparisons as mentioned above (which contain the design project "original" from which to compose the printing tables;
- further three phases such as "fittizie" phases: e.g.,existing, projectf, variantf (always in the same chronological order): in practice to make a "duplication" of the procedure as drafted in the first three stages.
In fact, in the state of fact, you bring back the project to the initial state of fact.
the projectf and variantf phases can be created by duplicating the views contained in the "normal" phases

Therefore, proceed on the fictitious phases, the fusion of the variant state with projectf.

attention that, in cases where you change the graphical replacement of the "temporaneous" working phase (for the "fittizie" phases) in case the temporneo has been used, with different spelling, in the "normal" phases, the same will be modified.

Of course, if you have to print the table only contain the only comparison views of the three stages, you should generate it with the use of a copy of the file.
the other tables the dies from the original project views (file)
 
Last edited:
I disagree:

... project submitted in common.
Before the start, the customer asked for a variant. .
therefore means that the executive (table) necessary to the enterprise that builds it is the variant, which of course will also include the new walls and demolitions (definitive) previewed in the project and not varied from the "variant" ...
...the executive project for the yard must include all the changes made, in particular the comparative table of the dem.-cos..
Bye.
... or the demolitions and constructions of the variant compared to the factual state.

the enterprise does not care to know if in the state of project a new wall was previewed that in the variant has been demolished (it is not necessary anymore), or to know if a wall that in the project was demolished and in the reconstructed variant (as in the state of fact, there is already and leaves it) ...
 
Thanks for the answers.
I opted for the classic solution, print the executive boards corresponding to the design state (with the comparative sdf-sdp) and print the executive boards corresponding to the variant state (with the comparative sdp-sdv).
I will put it in the drawer for any future use.
little note, you say:
the company Not interested to know if in the state of project a new wall was planned that in the variant was demolished (no longer necessary), or to know if a wall that in the project was demolished and in the reconstructed variant (as in the fact state, there is already and leaves it) ...
but in the case, I have doors and walls demolished in the variant, on the existing parts for which if the two methods do not apply (new-three stages later) the comparison between the sdf and sdv cannot be seen.
Thank you.
 
I'm ready for the first time to use phases.
Help! I just didn't understand anything! despite reading the various forum content and tutorials.
I have already made two projects with revit but aimed at rendering.
use revit 2012.

radical renovation of cottage. usual things: new pieces, in demolition, window slip, coat, etc.

I created 3 floors:
1. plan first state
2. first floor prog
3. first floor gr (overlapping)

in the menu on the left
I have 3 filters: design, state made, gr
I have 3 stages: as above+no

in the high-phase menu, phase filters
comparative line1: replaced, by categ, sost, not displayed
row 3 made state: not visualized, by categ, nv,nv
line 4 state prog: by cat, by cat, nv,nv

example. in project, select new wall, filter: prog phase creation nobody
Or not? ok the project plan works.
And for everything? I understand nothing!
 
the phase indicates a chronological order of the graphic representation of the design/objects.
call it an existing state and a new state or project state, or phase 1 phase 2 phase 3, absolutely nothing changes: it is the order that counts (passed-future)
filters, applied to phases (work), which are:
- new
- existing
- demolished
- temporary (which is similar to the new + demolished "work" in the same chronological phase)
select the display with a specific graph (= graphic replacement) to be displayed in the current phase compared to the previous phase.
 
Last edited:
an example.
from the menu managed>phasis of the project
creates with " insert after" a new phase (temporal) called "phase 1"
repeat the operation by calling the new phase 2

nb: phase 1 could be called "existing state", phase 2 = project status

now passes from the field phases of project, to the field "filters of the phases of work"
with the "new" button, create three new filters (filter name) that you call sf (actual state); (project status); gr (comparative), not to be confused with the names of the phases.

nb: You will notice that in the field of phase filters, there is already a default filter (show everything), which is not editable.

in such phase filters you must assign to each present field, namely:
- new = the element was created in the phase of the current view.
- existing = the element was created in a previous phase and is still present in the current phase.
- demolished = the element was created in a previous phase and was demolished in the current phase.
- temporary = the element was created and demolished during the current phase.

the relative display of the elements (objects), chosen between :

- by category = displays items according to the settings defined in the object styles dialog box;
-replaced = displays the elements according to the settings defined in the graphical replacement board (of the steps);
- not displayed = does not display items.

now, in the filter phase sf, (state of fact) in the field "new" selections "by category", i.e. indiche to the sw that the objects drawn are to be represented with what indicated in the vg (graphic visualization) "stili objects"
the other fields, (in theory) being the "initial" representation are influential, and can be represented with "replaced".

For this purpose, or as a phase filter of the initial state (esitente) you can also use the phase filter (fdf) : shows everything.

in the second fdf - sp (project status) and in the relative fields you must assign:
- new -> per category
-existing -> per category
- demolished -> undisplayed
- temporary -> not displayed

or indicate to the sw that:
- the new objects designed in the current view must be represented with what is indicated in the vg "stil objects"
- objects designed in the previous view (and not modified) must be represented with what is indicated in the vg "sty objects"
- objects built in the previous view and demolished in the current view are not represented
- temporary objects, i.e. constructed and demolished in the current view, are not represented

in the third fdf- sp (comparative state) and in the relative fields you must assign:
- new - > replaced
-existing -> per category
- demolished - > replaced
- temporary -> not displayed

or indicate to the sw that:
- the new objects designed in the current view must be represented with what is indicated in the vg of the phases "graphic replacement" (red)
- objects designed in the previous view (and not modified) must be represented with what is indicated in the vg "sty objects"
- objects built in the receding view and demolished in the current view must be represented with what is indicated in the vg of the phases "graphic replacement" (yellow)
- temporary objects, i.e. constructed and demolished in the current view, are not represented

now, open a new project file, in the project browser, display views "by phase" and "family and type" from the menu : user interface -> browser organization -> views (by phase); and then edit -> folders (by family and type); or other order of choice

creates a view of plant (e.g. ground floor)
assigns to this view phase 1 (actual state)
assign phase filter : show everything (or sf)
draws two parallel walls (in practice you are drawing walls with the vg of the "stiles of objects)

duplicate the above plant view
assigns phase 2 to the same
assigns fdf sp (project)
draw a wall perpendicular to the two and demolish one of the two (the lower one).
in the view you will have two walls in the form of "t"

duplicate the above plant view
assigns (leave) to phase 2 itself
assigns fdf gr (comparative)
in the view you will have:
- the demolished wall of yellow color
- the red perpendicular wall
- the wall designed in phase 1 of black color

p.s. the "graphic replacement" field of phase filters, incites the graphic display to be applied when in the "phase filter" checks the "replaced" value.
It is obvious that:
- the new must be assigned lines and motifs of red color
- the demolished must be assigned lines and motifs of yellow color
- the existing must be assigned lines and motifs of black color
- the temporary must be assigned lines and color motifs "personalized"

. I hope I wasn't messed up...
 
Last edited:
... if in the same phase (e.g. phase 2 = project status) , you want to highlight only the "new built", you have to create a new fdf (e.g. sc = only new built) and in the phase fields, select:
- new -> per category
-existing -> not displayed
- demolished -> undisplayed
- temporary -> not displayed

or indicate to the sw that:
- the new objects designed in the current view must be represented with what is indicated in the vg "stil objects"
- objects designed in the previous view (and not modified) are not represented
- objects built in the receding view and demolished in the current view are not represented
- temporary objects, i.e. constructed and demolished in the current view, are not represented

or
you want to highlight only the new built colored in red, you have to create a new fdf (eg scr = only new built red) and in the phase fields, select:
- new - > replaced
-existing -> not displayed
- demolished -> undisplayed
- temporary -> not displayed

or indicate to the sw that:
- the new objects designed in the current view must be represented with what is indicated in the vg of the phases "graphic replacement" (red)
- objects designed in the previous view (and not modified) are not represented
- objects built in the receding view and demolished in the current view are not represented
- temporary objects, i.e. constructed and demolished in the current view, are not represented

then, in the plant view of the example above, ground floor, still duplicates the view, and assigns to the same:
phase = phase 2 (project)
phase filter = sc (only it is)
or
phase filter = scr (only built red)
and you will have graphic representations depending on the selected phase filter: only new walls in black or red color
 
Last edited:
wonderful. your second intervention allowed me - following your step-by-step directions - to solve all plans. some small detail to solve (sigh, coat) but now I have the tools to understand.
I had read so many tutorials... but a disaster!
Thanks again.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top