Just... it's like if you leave the car keys unattended, my underage son takes them, starts the vehicle and causes an accident. is to see that the fault is of the car manufacturer because it has not installed the parental control! :roflmao::roflmao:the manager of the pc is his owner. if it leaves access with administrative rights to the nephew the fault is not of autodesk or other software house but of the owner of the pc that has not been sufficiently noticed.
It's not the same thing, the damage a teenager makes by modeling an object to print with the 3d printer and then showing him to schoolmates is null. Not like that for the same teenager who takes the parent's car and invests a passer.the manager of the pc is his owner. if it leaves access with administrative rights to the nephew the fault is not of autodesk or other software house but of the owner of the pc that has not been sufficiently noticed.
Of course. but in both cases the fault cannot however fall on the manufacturer/software houseIt's not the same thing.
It's true, but it's also true that it's not the software house to do laws and impose draconiane sanctions for the distraction of a parent to his boyfriend. This would be discussed in a court but no one wants to face a trial when it can be resolved by satisfying the demand for the software house. It seems to me that the law explicitly contains the case of non-commercial use (the child modeling the object to be printed in 3d), the problem is to prove it.Of course. but in both cases the fault cannot however fall on the manufacturer/software house
reality is that clearly highlighted in his post by @exxon:made the necessary premise, it must also be added that extortion is crime as much as the theft, therefore the action described above deserves the same bias reserved to those who use illegal software.
to ask 50,000 euros as a "good" solution to the installation of any pirate software is pure extortion and a toned judge would certainly express themselves in these terms. the aggressive and intimidating attitude is already proof of itself.
There are so many metropolitan legends on the gdf that is "sended" by someone at someone's house... are legends: gdf does not move on indications of companies that boast supposed credits, but independently or on indication of the inquirent magistrate.
Guy accuses me of using his software unduly? Well, try it. What brings as proof, a list of ip and mac address? And what proof is this? any Trojan is able to read the mac of millions of pcs, while the ip is a public information that any portal receives from all the pcs that access you.
those above are not direct evidence (i.e., to immediately demonstrate a fact without any logical operation), but indirect evidence, those that we all know as "individuals". a clue doesn't prove anything. only if the clues are numerous, serious, precise and agreeing, the judge (only him) can arrive at the presumption of crime. from here to a condemnation the road is really long.
the test would be if, during an inspection visit of the gdf for different verifications, inspectors found the software installed, or maybe someone at the time of its use. possession of the only ip and mac address can not even remotely be considered evidence, but it could be considered a simple clue, useful to constitute a legal presumption in case it was supported by other precise and agreeing serious clues, otherwise it is not worth anything.
In this case, if the company is challenged to have indebtedly used in a specific period such software falls, and from the analysis of the accounting data of the same it turns out that in the period in question it has turnover plans attributable to such software, signed contracts that previewed the delivery of files produced with the same, and perhaps the testimony of an employee who under oath confirms to have used it, here, these are serious precise and agreeing clues that they can convince judge.
freecad is open source, or there should be a free version of solid edge, for hobbyists.good afternoon to all, this discussion gives me a small point, is there an effective parametric cad 3d? using sw for home use and wanting to avoid expensive licenses, do you have advice on packages similar to solidworks, create, inventor and related? it is very good to talk about legality, but it goes from if to build a furniture or a house structure nobody would dream of investing 3000 - 4000€ for a license, although it is true that the use of a parametric facilitates the realization of artifacts and reduces the possibility of error. I would like to ask you to use it for personal purposes. Thanks for the tips you want to give me.
great, thank you very much, freecad I was looking at it, but it didn't seem exceptional, I check solid edge. Thanks again.freecad is open source, or there should be a free version of solid edge, for hobbyists.
great, thank you very much, freecad I was looking at it, but it didn't seem exceptional, I check solid edge. Thanks again.
I have seen, tomorrow the unload, says that watermark the designs, but for my purpose it is perfect, it only touches me to learn to use it! Thanks again