polylinea on lina bitch

[passi]

Hello, everyone!
I looked deep into the forum, but I found nothing that could solve my problem.
more than a problem is a curiosity: is it possible to draw a polyline consisting of segments of different lengths (and fixed by the user), "tracking" (or rather fixed) the trace of a curved line below?
In the sense, it is possible to do this without having to continuously zoom back and forth to approach as much as possible the various segments of polylinea to the original line to follow?
Thank you very much to those who will answer! :

 

[Cristallo]

I have not understood the question:
Do you want to "discretize" a pline with constant steps, along an existing curve?
If yes, use the command "measure" (I believe it addiates it also architectures) after you "join the dots". .

 

[passi]

I have not understood the question:
Do you want to "discretize" a pline with constant steps, along an existing curve?
If yes, use the command "measure" (I believe it addiates it also architectures) after you "join the dots". .

Thank you for the answer. Anyway, no, I don't want to discuss the curve. I simply want to "sign above" a polyline consisting of a series of small straight segments of different sizes (fixed by me) that follow the path of the underlying curve. doing it normally the "rogna" is that giving a length to every stretch of polylinea, to make it coincide as much as possible to the existing curve it is necessary to approach as much as possible, to eliminate errors.
I don't know if I could explain myself, I hope so!

 

[dieva]

While entering the points of the future polylinea must be active the near osnap mode (near in the English version) that guarantees that the returned points are part of the entity that falls within the pointer's influence area.

 

[passi]

While entering the points of the future polylinea must be active the near osnap mode (near in the English version) that guarantees that the returned points are part of the entity that falls within the pointer's influence area.

Right, I thought so. with near osnap marks me the points of the existing curve but when the length of the single segment is entered, almost always there is an inaccuracy and the final point of the segment realized is not part of the curve, but it differs of a tot. for that I find it necessary to zoom on the point, but it is very uncomfortable, especially if it is very large drawings, but that must be very precise. Any ideas?

 

[c3kkos]

command divides, creates points (snap) equidistant on the curve

 

[Cristallo]

I don't think that you measure it can solve the problem of steps, which wants to discuss (indicates exactly what you want to do, steps) with a beads that has segments not constant in length (decided by him, arbitrariness, also segment by segment) that are adherent to the base curve.
However also with the zoom method, the result is unpredictable. no one says that given a x distance from a certain point, you can make it coincide exactly on the reference curve. in 99.99% of cases or the final point does not belong to the curve, or the segment is not as long as it should.
If you want a "geometrically perfect" result the only way is to draw a circle on which parts, of radius equal to the segment you want to give, then draw the segment a-> int circle/curva. for each pline segment.
but I think it's a pure madness, unless that precision is functional to something.
On the other hand, you cannot think of a macro/lisp because there is no "rule" in the length of your segments. and a program needs rules, directions, choices.