print problems: nuances in annotations

[morpheo_9]

Hello, everyone.
I would like to ask you a curious question. I recently had issues regarding the annotation level. I usually use this level, to quote viewports and to insert colored fields or shades. As regards the samples, I have noticed some problems in the press which, despite being only coupled with nets created in the layers, created problems in the printing phase, such as the representation of a thinner line than that set or even the cancellation of the net. clearly eliminating these nuances, the problems are gone.
I would like to ask you for advice on this.
Thank you.

 

[lory.b]

Hi.
typically they are problems related to printers, especially when there are some shades. Do you have a way to try on another printer?
I do.

 

[Zeno Da Ros]

Hello, everyone.
I would like to ask you a curious question. I recently had issues regarding the annotation level. I usually use this level, to quote viewports and to insert colored fields or shades. As regards the samples, I have noticed some problems in the press which, despite being only coupled with nets created in the layers, created problems in the printing phase, such as the representation of a thinner line than that set or even the cancellation of the net. clearly eliminating these nuances, the problems are gone.
I would like to ask you for advice on this.
Thank you.

Hi.
If possible I would ask you some more information.

1) that vw version uses.
2) what do you mean by "samplings coupled with nets created in layers"
3) you do not understand whether printing problems are related to sampling or retinals.
4) you don't understand how ever in the end everything changes in shades

In short, you don't understand what you're trying to ask us. the space annotations (not a level) serves to create quotas and other objects. fillings (color, shades, restraints or nets) I respond differently to the printing phases. vw developers explicitly indicate that they do not use retinals, when in the printing phase with rasterization they always make a big mess. I know it's kind of crazy. are they themselves who say they don't use them, why don't they? I don't know. fact that retini+print is to be avoided as the plague.

then comes the press question. In fact, transparencies and nuances are handled badly by different types of printers. I had the same problem once. printing from an a3 printer showed me some "relaborations" that were quite unreasonable due to the inability of the printer to manage transparencies. printing from a plotter instead did not present problems. but they are speeches related to postscript, print elaborations, color rendering that is to say unexplorable universes and technical speeches in which I admit to understand us little, despite trying several times to understand us something.

Finally I recommend you to use the annotation space only for annotations and quotations. decorations, colors and fillings put them in a layer design aside or in categories apart and then manage viewport visibility options.

Say hi! :smile:

 

[lory.b]

Let's make a moment of clarity.
there are two types of retinals (although they should not be defined both):
1) hatch, or vector nets, or dashes (in Italian version)
2) the patterns, or bitmap nets, or nets (in the ita version, but I wouldn't translate them so...).

the first are the recommended ones, especially in view of the export in dwg.
The second is better to avoid them.
for shades and transparencies the speech is worth, not all printers are able to translate them correctly.

I agree with zeno that the samples should be applied on the drawing layer (each in its categories) and not in annotation.
I do.

 

[morpheo_9]

thanks to both for precise and punctual answers. I understand the problem perfectly. greetings

 

[casella]

thanks to both for precise and punctual answers. I understand the problem perfectly. greetings

[Bleep] could also depend on a non-perfect driver: this drawback is largely in the case.
www.paolocasella.it> > > plotterdriver
> > > the cad and prints