print speed, why linear? !

[leggendario]

Bye to all,
as it will be easy to notice I just wrote, in fact it was so much that I read the forum from "anonymous" but finally I decided not only to read the contributions or perplexities of others but to try also I to throw myself!

I ask you a question that perhaps to many experienced users will seem obvious but to me it leaves confused, because 90 times out of 100 in the descriptions of the printers under the heading "building speed" we talk about linear measures mm/h etc. and not volume? cm3/h or similar?

It doesn't seem so logical to me

I

 

[Venez]

hi (I am not an expert, so the shot to the sense), in the printer we have in the office it is possible to select the thickness of the deposit layers, so if the speed is expressed in cm3/h would be variable depending on the selection made, while if expressed in mm/h it goes to indicate the path mm that the head manages to do at the hour, regardless of the thickness or other variables.

Did I say a castle?

 

[leggendario]

hi (I am not an expert, so the shot to the sense), in the printer we have in the office it is possible to select the thickness of the deposit layers, so if the speed is expressed in cm3/h would be variable depending on the selection made, while if expressed in mm/h it goes to indicate the path mm that the head manages to do at the hour, regardless of the thickness or other variables.

Did I say a castle?

Hello, venez.
I might be wondering then why a maximum value is not indicated

the answer I gave was about the materials, different resins require different times (?).

We wait for some experienced user!

 

[IPdesign]

a small incident, the builders in the race to "who has it longer" indicate the maximum speed, which is sometimes the speed of moving fast and not deposition.
it follows that an i3 itch usually travels to 70mm/s of deposition, a makerbot to 80/90 mm/s, a layer to 100/110 mm/s and a wasp delta around 120/150mm/s
the delta also arrives at 300mm/s fast (it makes more cool 300m/s)

instead calculate the cm3/h is both misleading for those who try to make the accounts DIY, both because the printers can have nozzles with different diameters, so a printer with nozzle 0.20 will print less fast than a with nozzle 0.70 .
a 3d model with volume 500 cm3 could be printed with an inside downloaded to various density and the printing time changes considerably as the weight of the material changes.
so here is explained how never we talk about volume but shift

 

[leggendario]

thanks ip, it is more clear, the theme was born from my "engineering" plant where the cost of the product is measured in €/cm3,
including the theme I will try to understand if there is a way to understand how much I spend (at spans) per product piece. :

 

[IPdesign]

the only way to "understand" costs is to download a slycing software and see time and weight of the material used to produce your piece.
clear that a minimum of preparation you need