Woah
Guest
Hello, I have a little problem on the calculation of the axieme mass.
the situation is as follows: I have a set whose parts have not set the material but the weight, with the procedure widely described in various posts: creating a weight parameter, configuring the pro_mp_source on parameters and writing a report (messa in post regeneration): mp_density=(peso/1000)/pro_mp_volume, in the config. pro I have already set:mass_property_calculate automatic.
mmisura units are set as mmns, which corresponds to the unit of tons for the weight and the unit of tonn/mm3 for the density.
I did not impose the material as in other parts of steel because I have to simulate with a cube that gives an idea about the encumbrance of the piece in question (e.g. an endothermic motor by car) and of which I want to assign a weight.
here we are, regenero, calculation the report and the mass is right, par to es to 0.25 tons ( 250 kg).
the top axieme on which the above part is mounted has another part - motor support - whose weight is set in the same way -0.05 tonn (50kg).
the density is very low obviously given the unit of measurement: 7.87 and-10 for engine and 1.8552876e-10 for support
He had it when I go to the upper axieme and I ask for a mass analysis, he goes to ask for subpart density despite I set it up.
I have also noticed that using a much higher mass or multiplied by 1000 such probelma does not exist, I have as the obsessive that density is so nassa that it has not enough precision to calculate that of the sub-part, in the image there is also the third part that is the bell to which the density is not required. for it I had set with the usual method a weight of 39 kg but being the smaller footprint the density is: density = 1.2740731e-09 tonne / mm^3. I therefore believe that the system has a decimalial threshold below which does not calculate the density of the ele sub-parts requires me.
the question therefore is how to solve this probelma where to set a higher precision for the mass parmates of the axieme, it is sub-intensive that even for the axieme I had set the pro_mass paramtero _source parameters
ps.1
I also wanted to point out that by changing a mmkgs the problem does not exist but I wanted to maintain mmns since in alacune parts of the general axieme I would like to do structural analysis for which it is convenient to have set as u.misura mmns rather than mmkgs.
p.s.2
I'm doing evidence. I have modified the engine weight to 350 kg so a real density of 1,o and broken and-09 tonn/mm3...though this seems to be the threshold because as for the bell does not ask me the density now. therefore seems to have a lower threshold of the density of 1e-09 below which in an axieme to the part is not recognized the density allocated
the situation is as follows: I have a set whose parts have not set the material but the weight, with the procedure widely described in various posts: creating a weight parameter, configuring the pro_mp_source on parameters and writing a report (messa in post regeneration): mp_density=(peso/1000)/pro_mp_volume, in the config. pro I have already set:mass_property_calculate automatic.
mmisura units are set as mmns, which corresponds to the unit of tons for the weight and the unit of tonn/mm3 for the density.
I did not impose the material as in other parts of steel because I have to simulate with a cube that gives an idea about the encumbrance of the piece in question (e.g. an endothermic motor by car) and of which I want to assign a weight.
here we are, regenero, calculation the report and the mass is right, par to es to 0.25 tons ( 250 kg).
the top axieme on which the above part is mounted has another part - motor support - whose weight is set in the same way -0.05 tonn (50kg).
the density is very low obviously given the unit of measurement: 7.87 and-10 for engine and 1.8552876e-10 for support
He had it when I go to the upper axieme and I ask for a mass analysis, he goes to ask for subpart density despite I set it up.
I have also noticed that using a much higher mass or multiplied by 1000 such probelma does not exist, I have as the obsessive that density is so nassa that it has not enough precision to calculate that of the sub-part, in the image there is also the third part that is the bell to which the density is not required. for it I had set with the usual method a weight of 39 kg but being the smaller footprint the density is: density = 1.2740731e-09 tonne / mm^3. I therefore believe that the system has a decimalial threshold below which does not calculate the density of the ele sub-parts requires me.
the question therefore is how to solve this probelma where to set a higher precision for the mass parmates of the axieme, it is sub-intensive that even for the axieme I had set the pro_mass paramtero _source parameters
ps.1
I also wanted to point out that by changing a mmkgs the problem does not exist but I wanted to maintain mmns since in alacune parts of the general axieme I would like to do structural analysis for which it is convenient to have set as u.misura mmns rather than mmkgs.
p.s.2
I'm doing evidence. I have modified the engine weight to 350 kg so a real density of 1,o and broken and-09 tonn/mm3...though this seems to be the threshold because as for the bell does not ask me the density now. therefore seems to have a lower threshold of the density of 1e-09 below which in an axieme to the part is not recognized the density allocated
