problem creation hole on crank pin.

[sampom]

Do you know why I put the statistics?
have meaning for you?
Am I an index of something?

Yes, of course.
but apparently you read only what you want:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[SolidUser]

Yes, of course.
but apparently you read only what you want:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

I participate in this forum only when writing inaccuracies or proposed solutions are not optimal.
I also try to insert information on solidworks when I consider it useful to all users of solidworks, for design solutions, not within on this unless expressly requested.

 

[sampom]

I participate in this forum only when writing inaccuracies or proposed solutions are not optimal.
I also try to insert information on solidworks when I consider it useful to all users of solidworks, for design solutions, not within this regard if not expressly requested.

on (from now on for brevity:biggrin, no one denies your preparation and contribution that you give to the forum with solutions and info more than useful. But perhaps (and I repeat perhaps..) the spirit and approach could (and I repeat could) be a little different.. Yes, lightness, soavity, openness of mind.. What the hell?

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[Mike1967]

Come on, a beer. All together... and talking about gnokka....:biggrin:

teamspeak is great....

 

[sampom]

Come on, a beer. All together... and talking about gnokka... .
teamspeak is great....

First, first. .
Book!

all together passionately, finally talking about serious things:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[Richart]

Gentlemen,

I clarify my situation:

I am not an engineer and I am attending the university, for now the only degree I have is the third media, I attend an industrial technical institute to address aeronautical constructions, I graduate in July, and then to undertake university career.

I have no basis in design 3d, my only knowledge in the cad field is based on the use of 2004 autocad learned in my school. I started using sw because a teacher explained to me how it was now obsolete the 3d system of autocad 2004, then armed with curiosity and want to learn now I follow the course 3d of autocad at school, but instead of drawing with the software of the course, drawing with sw learning day by self-taught, hoping that one day I will turn useful.

I thank you for all the design and modeling advice you have provided me
(of some I was completely unaware).
I decided to recreate the tree by modeling it all from the full thing that I had never done before, in fact I had not really thought about it (I fear that this is due to my family only with the 2d); However, I am very happy because I have learned some new functions:

I forgot, with a little patience I managed to create holes. :smile:

I attach the file and hope in other your tips/criticals.

thanks to all for the collaboration.

 

[Mike1967]

Gentlemen,

I clarify my situation:

I am not an engineer and I am attending the university, for now the only degree I have is the third media, I attend an industrial technical institute to address aeronautical constructions, I graduate in July, and then to undertake university career.

I have no basis in design 3d, my only knowledge in the cad field is based on the use of 2004 autocad learned in my school. I started using sw because a teacher explained to me how it was now obsolete the 3d system of autocad 2004, then armed with curiosity and want to learn now I follow the course 3d of autocad at school, but instead of drawing with the software of the course, drawing with sw learning day by self-taught, hoping that one day I will turn useful.

I thank you for all the design and modeling advice you have provided me
(of some I was completely unaware).
I decided to recreate the tree by modeling it all from the full thing that I had never done before, in fact I had not really thought about it (I fear that this is due to my family only with the 2d); However, I am very happy because I have learned some new functions:

I forgot, with a little patience I managed to create holes. :smile:

I attach the file and hope in other your tips/criticals.

thanks to all for the collaboration.

thanks to you for your intervention, you have clarified many things...
I put my file as others will post theirs.
do not take literally the measures I put, are a little invented
because from your imm scann you don't see all.
look at the procedure I have adopted.

Who likes statistics. . .

Function statistics:


pin and handle mike 05/03/2011 23.32.01

functions 16, solids 1, surfaces 0
total time for reconstruction in seconds: 0.17


% time order function

27.33 0.05 radius connection 5
9.30 0.02 key
9.30 0.02 sketch33
9.30 0.02 sketch28
9.30 0.02 fly
9.30 0.02 pin
8.72 0.01 hole ø8.0
8.72 0.01 mirror1
8.72 0.01 hole ø8.0 (8)-1
0.00 0.00 sketch24
0.00 0.00 sketch25
0.00 0.00 sketch27
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 radius connection 1


Hi.

 

[sampom]

Gentlemen,
I clarify my situation:. .

That's good. with commitment, study, many trials and humility:finger:
(and forgives the "pseudo polemic", born certainly not because of you)

welcome among us and happy to help you:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

p.s.

I put my file as others will post theirs.

We have already given:biggrin:

 

[sampom]

p.s... we have already given:biggrin:

But since I don't want to go to sleep the rest as I would have done it without leaving a full circle (which wanted to be a "didactic" way. with this I do not want to teach anything):View attachment ALBERO MOTORE 01.rarstats are in the picture, I'm not rewriting everything.
mike, I beat you in the fly for a 2 cent neckline and a few less functions:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[SolidUser]

on (from now on for brevity:biggrin, no one denies your preparation and contribution that you give to the forum with solutions and info more than useful. But perhaps (and I repeat perhaps..) the spirit and approach could (and I repeat could) be a little different.. Yes, lightness, soavity, openness of mind.. What the hell?

greetings
Marco:smile:

I'm kindly asking you to reread or who wants my interventions before the hit and the answer.
you and mike criticized me.
You told me that you had already put in the post and so it was useless my intervention.
I intervene because your solution is not optimal.
same thing in fact mike, which has not even realized that the generated surface is not planar.
makes the spaccone by inserting renderings with coarse errors and is justified also by giving cog... and incompetent to an architect....if he knew.
that the architects are esthetic for antonomasia.

Well, what about every post I have confirmation of what I thought.

 

[Mike1967]

I'm kindly asking you to reread or who wants my interventions before the hit and the answer.
you and mike criticized me.
You told me that you had already put in the post and so it was useless my intervention.
I intervene because your solution is not optimal.
same thing in fact mike, which has not even realized that the generated surface is not planar.
makes the spaccone by inserting renderings with coarse errors and is justified also by giving cog... and incompetent to an architect....if he knew.
that the architects are esthetic for antonomasia.

Well, what about every post I have confirmation of what I thought.

Mitiko.... no more. Professor!

You always had to think that I'm not a technician, almost everything I know
I learned it myself experimenting on my skin and spending nights with various programs.
you, we know very well that you are strong and competent, even if from the post of your presentation you thank in advance who would help you (instead you know more than a var), you are
a highly professional technician and I, personally, can not compete with
Your preparation.
said this, take me for what I am -(I have written clear letters in my profile)-a
metalcostuttore and as such I would challenge you in the workshop, with tig welds on ac stainless 0.5 mm free hand (just to make an example) brazing on brass details, construction of cards to be finished through satin, and other chicche that you, from the top of your office, can not even imagine.
Put yourself in the head that I am a crank. .

 

[SolidUser]

Mitiko.... no more. Professor!

You always had to think that I'm not a technician, almost everything I know
I learned it myself experimenting on my skin and spending nights with various programs.
you, we know very well that you are strong and competent, even if from the post of your presentation you thank in advance who would help you (instead you know more than a var), you are
a highly professional technician and I, personally, can not compete with
Your preparation.
said this, take me for what I am -(I have written clear letters in my profile)-a
metalcostuttore and as such I would challenge you in the workshop, with tig welds on ac stainless 0.5 mm free hand (just to make an example) brazing on brass details, construction of cards to be finished through satin, and other chicche that you, from the top of your office, can not even imagine.
Put yourself in the head that I am a crank. .

I didn't do any solidworks.
solidworks was taken in r&d for 2 ing, then when I passed there, the course was already finished.
I've learned it by cuffing and questioning myself every time in front of a problem.
then the official cad was made.
then work with many people, problems with large assemblies, modeling problems, table setting, etc.. lead you to always find a better method.
var doesn't work 8 hours a day.
I still read, I try... I try. I look for new solutions when new versions come out, I do not fossilize the method used until yesterday.

 

[Mike1967]

I didn't do any solidworks.
solidworks was taken in r&d for 2 ing, then when I passed there, the course was already finished.
I've learned it by cuffing and questioning myself every time in front of a problem.
then the official cad was made.
then work with many people, problems with large assemblies, modeling problems, table setting, etc.. lead you to always find a better method.
var doesn't work 8 hours a day.
I still read, I try... I try. I look for new solutions when new versions come out, I do not fossilize the method used until yesterday.

I have to say, only to do this, which I also approve, takes time.
sometimes I am forced to mortal jumps between reliefs in the yard, draw quickly and fury, cure the construction in the workshop and give indications for laying... in addition to carpentry works including plates and frames....:frown:

 

[sampom]

I'm kindly asking you to reread or who wants my interventions before the hit and the answer. .

Come on, and drop the shot. .
It seems to me that you should reread for good.

you told me that you had already inserted the answer and so my intervention was useless..

ah, would I have told you that? Come on, try carefully and not always hard:

Forgive me for contradicting you.. (apart from the file I already posted to him, but 2 solutions are better than one :biggrinmarco:smile:

I even added that more solutions are better (and desirable when possible). and I was certainly not wrong, I take it as a pleasant pastime "among friends", I.
two solutions can be useless if equal, but the commitment comes well.
I'm sorry to tell you, but your (check it, I've already written it) was incomplete and with that incorrect axial hole. I understood it, but a "novice" probably doesn't come to change thescope of function: ... and then tell me about optimal solutions.
Then give some extra indication, you can't let it build that multibody piece with bodies kept from nothing. That's a single, solid part. But you must know. .
At least I, in my infinite ignorance and with all and (or)rorises of modeling, I put it complete, so that you can get over it.

Well, what about every post I have confirmation of what I thought.

You said that. .

...you and mike have criticized me. . .

You miserable. I am no one to criticize, and read this:

...no one denies your preparation and contribution that gives to the forum with solutions and info more than useful...

thought I confirm daily. but when it is the case I answer and certainly tono.. here, just the tone; see how a certain type of approach can be "fast"? read and reflect.
here no one is better than anyone, but if someone really wants to be, he must be ready to receive some critical "good news".

I'm telling you that your contribution is sometimes really priceless and I hope you continue with more and more interesting things.
but in the same way I repeat you to smile and give up the knife from your teeth.. that doesn't mean just putting the faces. .

greetings
Marco:smile:

This is nothing to do with my position as a moderator.

 

[SolidUser]

Come on, and drop the shot. .
It seems to me that you should reread for good.
ah, would I have told you that? I have added that more solutions are better (and desirable when possible). and I was certainly not wrong, I take it as a pleasant pastime "among friends", I.
two solutions can be useless if equal, but the commitment comes well.
I'm sorry to tell you, but your (check it, I've already written it) was incomplete and with that incorrect axial hole. I understood it, but a "novice" probably doesn't come to change thescope of function:View attachment 19788 ... and then tell me about optimal solutions.
Then give some extra indication, you can't let it build that multibody piece with bodies kept from nothing. That's a single, solid part. But you must know. .
At least I, in my infinite ignorance and with all and (or)rorises of modeling, I put it complete, so that you can get over it.

You said that. .

You miserable. I am no one to criticize, and also read this: thinking that I confirm daily. but when it is the case I answer and certainly tono.. here, just the tone; see how a certain type of approach can be "fast"? read and reflect.
here no one is better than anyone, but if someone really wants to be, he must be ready to receive some critical "good news".

I'm telling you that your contribution is sometimes really priceless and I hope you continue with more and more interesting things.
but in the same way I repeat you to smile and give up the knife from your teeth.. that doesn't mean just putting the faces. .

greetings
Marco:smile:

This is nothing to do with my position as a moderator.

It's true... I forgot the flag on the result unit, for what the hole doesn't pass on the turned part.