problem di stamp revit 2011

[lallo]

Hello I immediately press that I do not know if it is really a problem of revit 2011 or less but this happens to me: throwing a table of a row of revit(project) with some 3d view inserted, my plotter (a hp desingjet 500 not postcript) plant at 2/3 of the table, at the same point. the beauty is that this happens almost systematically (not always 4 yes and 1 no!!). transforming the revit table in pdf (with its revit driver) and then printing it in pdf with a pdf viewer the problem does not arise at all! !
from this behavior seems at first sight a problem (not of memory of the plotter) but of language between revit2011 and the plotter hp! I tried to make the spolling inside the pc but nothing the problem arises again!!!. Did any of you have the same problem? Thank you very much.

 

[nirvana]

I had done a post on the fact that revit has problems printing with hp500..

Besides the one you reported, we had the same problem with the jpeg photos put directly on the tables. . .
In the end I discovered that it is the plotter (500), we also have a hp770 and does no problem with the same design. .
even if you put some letters in the non-printing cartiglio... or write too much in one of the rows of the table cartilage. . .
a system is to make only one project with renderings in jpeg (or other photos) imported into another file but without project, sometimes it works. . .

 

[flaviosyd]

I have problems with my hp 800: if I do not mold with a very high screen zoom I have very low quality prints and the same happens to me with the dwf, any ideas?

 

[lallo]

I wanted to report that he followed my post expressed on this blog I received as a private message the following exquisitely "commercial" nature response: ".....from this behavior seems at first sight a problem (not plotter memory) but language between revit2011 and plotter hp!...--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
could be a driver problem.
we may have a solution; We need a contact as there is no possibility to post on the forum. contact...(omississ). Of course I didn't call but the strange thing is that I got in the form of private message!! all here! good work

 

[gfrank]

In reality the message was initially visible but it was erased by me, precisely because it is advertising not in conformity with the rules of the forum.

the deleted messiage came to you in mp, as (I believe) who wrote the message (later deleted) successfully sent it also through mp.

 

[casella]

In reality the message was initially visible but it was erased by me, precisely because it is advertising not in conformity with the rules of the forum. . . . . . cutting.

[bleep] moderator,
we have noticed that you have deleted from the forum our answer, because made by a dealer.

are almost ten years that we participate in your and other forums and this situation, already discussed in cad3d, seemed to be overcome (in other discussions you can find our messages).
However, we have to clarify both to you and to the forum participants, so we respond here and not in private.
the norms you recalled seems to have respected them as though retailers, we have not set a purely advertising message (spam) but a response to an exposed problem.
we respond to specific issues arising from cad prints, which are 99% caused by unto-date drivers, not perfect or even missing: forums are filled, especially with the advent of win 7 64 for which many plotters are no longer supported (see for example the hp forums, autodesk, etc.).
being we retailers, it is clear that, beyond free generic answers that can often be given, many times we will have to offer solutions that predict the purchase of something, like in the specific case of drivers, that are a third party product and therefore for sale.
having us what we think is a solution, why should we not provide it?
then each makes the use that it considers more appropriate than the information we provide: Why then rule out that someone is looking for a paid solution to his problem, so that he can know who to take it if he paid and maybe the problem is not solved?
in any case it is always an extra information or solution.

How else could we respond to the above message?
"Do you call us that we will give you the probable solution - tel 0xxxxxxxxxxxxx?
or "contact us ssssa@pxxxxxx"?
we have already done it in the past and immediately someone has been resentful: "if you have the solution because you do not make it available to everyone, respecting the philosophy of the forum? "

Why don't we just answer privately?
because many use false addresses and are not reachable; then just for the above reasons: many others can find themselves in the same situation and can come to know the existence of the solution and where to find it.
Our answers always make clear our references, as you have seen them in the middle of our message, just to highlight that we are dealers and that we do not play on the equivocal.

I return access statistics (in August alone!) to our pages, coming from some forums.
http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php 25 access 9.9 % http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/windows-7/hp-designjet-750c-plus-dr... 21 accesses 3.9 %http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showthread.php 6 access 2.3 % http://www.prontogeometra.it/driverwinline.htm 6 accesses 2.3%


thank you for the attention

cordial greetings to all.

 

[gfrank]

[bleep] moderator,
we have noticed that you have deleted from the forum our answer, because made by a dealer... .

....

absolutely false...

... for almost ten years we participate in your and other forums and this situation, already discussed in cad3d, seemed to be overcome (in other discussions you can find our messages).

....

I thank you for the contribution given to the forum, I write it in confidence, because I did not have the opportunity to read the others (works) interventions ...

....we still have a clarification, both to you and to the participants in the forum, so we respond here and not in private.
the norms you recalled seems to have respected them as though retailers, we have not set a purely advertising message (spam) but a response to an exposed problem.
we respond to specific issues arising from cad prints, which are 99% caused by unto-date drivers, not perfect or even missing: forums are filled, especially with the advent of win 7 64 for which many plotters are no longer supported (see for example the hp forums, autodesk, etc.).
being we retailers, it is clear that, beyond free generic answers that can often be given, many times we will have to offer solutions that predict the purchase of something, like in the specific case of drivers, that are a third party product and therefore for sale.
having us what we think is a solution, why should we not provide it?
then each makes the use that it considers more appropriate than the information we provide: Why then rule out that someone is looking for a paid solution to his problem, so that he can know who to take it if he paid and maybe the problem is not solved?
in any case it is always an extra information or solution.

How else could we respond to the above message?
"Do you call us that we will give you the probable solution - tel 0xxxxxxxxxxxxx?
or "contact us ssssa@pxxxxxx"?
we have already done it in the past and immediately someone has been resentful: "if you have the solution because you do not make it available to everyone, respecting the philosophy of the forum? "

Why don't we just answer privately?
because many use false addresses and are not reachable; then just for the above reasons: many others can find themselves in the same situation and can come to know the existence of the solution and where to find it.
Our answers always make clear our references, as you have seen them in the middle of our message, just to highlight that we are dealers and that we do not play on the equivocal.

I return access statistics (in August alone!) to our pages, coming from some forums.
http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php 25 access 9.9 % http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/windows-7/hp-designjet-750c-plus-dr... 21 accesses 3.9 %http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showthread.php 6 access 2.3 % http://www.prontogeometra.it/driverwinline.htm 6 accesses 2.3%


thank you for the attention

cordial greetings to all.

It is clear, as you wrote, that the solution to the problem exposed by the user is possible to have it paid, as I had well understood.
nothing in contrast to your explanation, on the other hand you also "have to eat the loaf" and nothing in contrast to your offer to offer paid services.
but this is contrary to the spirit of the forum, consequently:
- it is good to accept your response to have identified the problem (... the drivers... );
- it is not acceptable that through the forum, mediated customers "direct advertising" (in charo) are acquired for free.

If you want to make a customer acquisition, and I repeat, I have nothing on the contrary, you cannot do it "in clear" without the substantial specific contribution to the message.
you could, as you did, contact the user via mp, without providing phones in the specific message.

I also remember that in the signing of the deleted post, you also entered your site, which in my opinion was more than enough for the contribution given in the specific message.

I close the discussion to avoid further controversy.