problem section ribs

[mauritius]

Does anyone know how I can prevent the ribs of a section from being sampled? use solidworks 2007

 

[sampom]

Does anyone know how I can prevent the ribs of a section from being sampled? use solidworks 2007

using to model her command nervation (always in the menu Functions), so that the table recognizes it and when you do the section opens the window to decide its exclusion.
and consult the help in case you have doubts for its use.

greetings
Mar

 

[ballino]

Bye to all,
reading the thread came a curiosity:
ribs are managed at part level as a bolean sum to the body that generates them.
with the introduction of the structural members I thought I could also ball the ribbs, quote them in the table itself and above all handle them as we do with the body in modeling.

How are you doing?

dancer

 

[re_solidworks]

Bye to all,
reading the thread came a curiosity:
ribs are managed at part level as a bolean sum to the body that generates them.
with the introduction of the structural members I thought I could also ball the ribbs, quote them in the table itself and above all handle them as we do with the body in modeling.

How are you doing?

dancer

Frankly I didn't understand your request, can you explain yourself better?

 

[sampom]

ribs are managed at part level as a bolean sum to the body that generates them.

I don't know (I don't understand?) and honestly I don't. in a "normal" part when you make ribbing becomes a multibody part; the bodies then you can save them externally to the "father file" but they will remain "without history".

with the introduction of the structural members I thought I could also ball the ribbs, quote them in the table itself and above all handle them as we do with the body in modeling.
How are you doing?
dancer

in welded with structural members there is another special command for ribs that become structural members. so you can safely post them and put them in separate cut as all other elements.

But maybe I didn't understand your request.

greetings
Mar

 

[ballino]

You're right. I've been a little cryptic. . .

premise
sw2009 and side files

I posted an example that shows better what I meant.

the ribbs( gusset) in the structural elements can be done (only flat faces) and then treated as individual bodies; in the cutting disc are listed and usable.

classical ribbs are not single bodies but only one (bolean sum) with the part that generated it (among other things one body admitted); Therefore you cannot move them and reposition them sen not after having divided them. Last: you can't make the single special table for carpentry preparation.

At this point I asked if the approach could be different.

Thank you for your patience

dancer

 

[sampom]

You're right. I've been a little cryptic. . .

premise
sw2009 and side files

I posted an example that shows better what I meant.

the ribbs( gusset) in the structural elements can be done (only flat faces) and then treated as individual bodies; in the cutting disc are listed and usable.

classical ribbs are not single bodies but only one (bolean sum) with the part that generated it (among other things one body admitted); Therefore you cannot move them and reposition them sen not after having divided them. Last: you can't make the single special table for carpentry preparation.

At this point I asked if the approach could be different.

Thank you for your patience

dancer

It is true, I understood wrong and explained even worse:biggrin: (and also wrong); the ribbing in the part as you say you become unique body. This is because (I believe) is understood by the system as a real rib, that is, for example, obtained in fusions and therefore absolutely unique body. and rightly gives you the opportunity to exclude the section on the table as standard.
instead in welds we talk about reinforcement handkerchief that so in practice is an element built apart and subsequently welded to the main bodies; as the structural elements becomes multibody and manageable to itself.
it is not possible to "misk" the two environments.
But if you have welded parts, why don't you use structural members? I know, the handkerchiefs on the table are not recognized as ribs and on the round tubular can not be put because they accept only flat reference faces (.. who knows then why?). and in the part the copied ribs are no longer recognized. . so much so that the ribs the patterns normally as solids "not united". . That's what you want to do.

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[re_solidworks]

and why not use the environment together?

 

[ballino]

thank you all,
I also thought of the axieme but then the cut list would be heterogeneous because it was reported on several side files.

I think the ribbs function is intimate with the part on which it leans and therefore in the logic of the developers should not be released: evolution could be the management of ribs as loose bodies.

"...but maybe the function was born for molds and therefore monolithic bodies. "

In any case, my opinion on the introduction of the welding environment is more than positive and never poses unresolvable criticalities.
thanks to all

dancer

 

[re_solidworks]

thank you all,
I also thought of the axieme but then the cut list would be heterogeneous because it was reported on several side files.

I think the ribbs function is intimate with the part on which it leans and therefore in the logic of the developers should not be released: evolution could be the management of ribs as loose bodies.

"...but maybe the function was born for molds and therefore monolithic bodies. "

In any case, my opinion on the introduction of the welding environment is more than positive and never poses unresolvable criticalities.
thanks to all

dancer

the welding environment is very high in modeling, but sometimes obliges to really strange procedures. the environment together allows for greater flexibility, sometimes at the expense of times.
Besides integrating welded into a pdm with "utonto-proof" controls is not at all easy, different is for traditional assemblies.