• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

problem with blocco parametrico

  • Thread starter Thread starter anfaloni
  • Start date Start date

anfaloni

Guest
Hello, guys, I'm sneaking around on this theme without success:

I have a cylindrical extrusion and its internal axle line. I have seen that working on the block editor I can parameterize inserting then as action the strech in axial direction allowing me to insert the block and screw it... but I have two problems:

1) does not allow me to trouble both the solid and the axis line, but the block editor and the association of the action straw is applied to the only axis line without affecting the extruded.

2) at the time when in the design I throw a lisp to insert the block in question, I lose the parameterization because it is inserted as block of the block...

Can you give me suggestions, please?
 
the solid (unfortunately) does not stretch it with a parameter action.
you can stretch it through the appropriate grip when it is a simple solid.
as long as you detract/unite something, or cut it or deform it, which becomes fixed, no longer editable
 
It's... it's bad what this shit is... it touches me to schematize him then with the only axis line you know...
 
if you agree to make the cylinder with the surfaces then you can do it: you have to realize a rectangle with the size of the radius and height, go to the surface menu and make the revolution careful that the surface associative key is activated, lock and open it in the dynamic blocks editor, assign a linear parameter and an ironing action to the cylinder and you will see that you let it iron.
 
if you agree to make the cylinder with the surfaces then you can do it: you have to realize a rectangle with the size of the radius and height, go to the surface menu and make the revolution careful that the surface associative key is activated, lock and open it in the dynamic blocks editor, assign a linear parameter and an ironing action to the cylinder and you will see that you let it iron.
Thanks for the tip. a road is definitely this or predict in the lisp that extrudes from point to point.

tristan, the esa pro does it and sincerely it seems to me an ad hoc tool for autocad not a real modeling program
 
But look... I can tell you that the impression is more than having a listed and unpacked autocad for the pipino than anything else...it doesn't happen only if you have a 3d autocad....and I think it has some parametric blocks made ad hoc....cmq is an impression of me, it would miss us.
 
But look... I can tell you that the impression is more than having a listed and unpacked autocad for the pipino than anything else...it doesn't happen only if you have a 3d autocad....and I think it has some parametric blocks made ad hoc....cmq is an impression of me, it would miss us.
confirmation
esapro is a tool for industrial piping and planting, if you do not have autocad under you do nothing, it is not autonomous.
It will not be parametric, as a program, but the blocks I think so.
Hi.
 
Hey, guys.

sorry for the perplexity...if in the work file you enter block, I go to import making it a block a file saved in a dedicated folder.
such file we put is composed of a solid and attributes. so far no problem, the import is good.
Instead, we need to import a solid endowed with an attribute that must then thrive, for example a cylinder and that, once wet, attribute to an attribute the value corresponding to the length reached... But how is it?

I tried with the parametric block trying to associate a characteristic parameter to the size that I will go to chip, but graphically the solid does not change.. .
I know, instead, that if I create a superfice, this is astonishing. . .
do you think it works if I associate the parameter variable to the axis of a cylinder generated with the supor command?
If I call in a drawing with the quick command ins, I will import as block such object...but will I be able to trouble him without entering the block editor? and if it changes. When I had a pasted copy of the block and then modified a...automatically, would the first imported block be changed?

I hope I explained. . .
 
if you agree to make the cylinder with the surfaces then you can do it: you have to realize a rectangle with the size of the radius and height, go to the surface menu and make the revolution careful that the surface associative key is activated, lock and open it in the dynamic blocks editor, assign a linear parameter and an ironing action to the cylinder and you will see that you let it iron.
I'm trying, but it gives me trouble... or better. ..creo a superfice with the surplo command taking circles and carrier director...then I define a block selecting superfice and vector itself. Now I try to associate the parameter from the blockbuster and then add the action to chip but it doesn't want to know... ..what anger
 
update.
I tried to define a cylindrical surface with the surplo command and create a block composed of it, the axis of the cylinder and the attributes. I then worked on the block editor at first inserting the "linear dim" parameter and then going to associate the strech action. the result is that now the block is dynamic and changes according to what I want strecchare, but I lose the attributes. going in fact on "you will extract data", attributes no longer appear as a selectable item. . I appear like tags... I solve one and exit another.. .
but why do I lose the attributes now?
 
update.
I tried to define a cylindrical surface with the surplo command and create a block composed of it, the axis of the cylinder and the attributes. I then worked on the block editor at first inserting the "linear dim" parameter and then going to associate the strech action. the result is that now the block is dynamic and changes according to what I want strecchare, but I lose the attributes. going in fact on "you will extract data", attributes no longer appear as a selectable item. . I appear like tags... I solve one and exit another.. .
but why do I lose the attributes now?
I tried again and managed not to lose the attribute...the thing that is not good is that if I for example take the block, copy and give different strechs to the two blocks, then two different sizes of lengths... if then I extract data, and attribute filter and geometry... returns me 2 as count and I can not find from bits the indication of the individual lengths of each block. Now instead the attributes appear, even if the parameters inherent in length, geometry do not have them on the same line of values associated with attributes. . .
 
solved... the info inherent in the distance, as long as you define the axis of the cylinder as polylinea, you find it in extract data by dividing "dynamic block". under dynamic block you will find "distanze" and such is the length of the polyline that identifies the axis. in the end it is great, because dividing only attribute and dynamic block keep on the same line of the exit excel all the info I need. by making copy and paste of the block in the same design, I then verified that, stirring them with different lengths, in phase of extracting data are counted as two different blocks and this is what I hoped. I hope you return to other experience
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top