• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

problem with inventor developments

  • Thread starter Thread starter HAKIM
  • Start date Start date

HAKIM

Guest
Good morning.
I have a serious problem about developments with inventor. I'm just using inventor and I'm not very practical. the developments of the sheet are abundant to me. How do I do to have the right development to have the right odds on the real piece?
do I change the k factor according to the material and thickness? If so, how do I do it? Do I have to make any formula to add in the program?
Thank you.
 
Hello, matteo,
Thank you for the answer.
exists a table to be inserted on inventor as parameters to be used on each material and thickness?
Thank you.
- - - updated - - - -
Hi.
of managing everything with sheet rules (default values icon) creating styles with various k factors

video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmrz-nhitso

apps autodesk:https://apps.autodesk.com/invntor/i...or&facet=&collection=&sort=&query=sheet+metal
Hello, matteo,
Thank you for the answer.
exists a table to be inserted on inventor as parameters to be used on each material and thickness?
Thank you.
 
Hi.
by default no;
if you use the k factor, you must associate to each thickness style a k factor value
I, according to my bending machine use for thicknesses up to 3mm the factor k=0,274 which "cuts" the thickness fold
example a sheet "l" 30x30 to 90° thickness 2mm, generates a development of 28+28mm

if you use larger thicknesses, I use the standard k factor of inventor k=0,440

allego pdf with "k factor theory"

you can then create styles for each thickness
 

Attachments

Hi.
by default no;
if you use the k factor, you must associate to each thickness style a k factor value
I, according to my bending machine use for thicknesses up to 3mm the factor k=0,274 which "cuts" the thickness fold
example a sheet "l" 30x30 to 90° thickness 2mm, generates a development of 28+28mm

if you use larger thicknesses, I use the standard k factor of inventor k=0,440

allego pdf with "k factor theory"

you can then create styles for each thickness
Thank you matteo
 
the question of sheet metal development can be seen in a very simplified manner.
Let us talk about it in this article if it can be useful.
 
the k factor depends on the material and of course on the thickness and radius of the peel, but also on the bending machine that is used , you have to do bend tests to determine the k factor, normally it is who bends the sheets that tells you the k factor to use for its machine based on thickness and material.
for thicknesses up to 20/10 and radius 1 mm you can use 0.28 if you don't need an excellent accuracy, for greater thickness you need to do tests (or ask the bending machine better) because differences can also be remarkable.
 
for better results you should draw using the real fold radius. each punch-matrix-material-thick combination can generate a different fold radius. Many times it is wrong to consider the punzone radius as an actual fold radius. then in the fold should be annotate which punch and matrix to use. a long workflow that not always, not all do
 
for better results you should draw using the real fold radius.
I'd say it's very important. you also have to pay close attention to imported files that almost certainly do not have the correct radius.
when I started making developments of sheet metal, a few years ago, I mistaken several before I realized that I applied factor k with a certain radius when the client who had passed the file had used a different radius.
Now the first thing I do about the details to bend is to change the radius.
 
for better results you should draw using the real fold radius. each punch-matrix-material-thick combination can generate a different fold radius. Many times it is wrong to consider the punzone radius as an actual fold radius. then in the fold should be annotate which punch and matrix to use. a long workflow that not always, not all do
I agree in full. I assumed that obviously the fold radius must be real otherwise.... but you did very well punctualized.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top