• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

problem with welded assembly

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paolo_F
  • Start date Start date

Paolo_F

Guest
Hello, I write for a problem with together welded in inventor 2013.
I made a welded set formed by a welded plate on a pipe and saved.
At this point I have to work this together making him a lamatura where I will go to weld a piece of pipe and give a new file name.
procedure:
- create new welded assembly
- place the first welded assembly
- creates tearing on this together
- place and bind the pipe piece
all right here with new name and no mistake.

now I have to weld the piece of pipe inserted.. I open the welding command and it gives me error, it tells me that the first file (tube+plate) is not updated and gives me errors on the constraints of the pipe bit placed after and I can't in any way do welding.

At this point I am doubtful that we cannot create a welded assembly starting from another welded assembly.

Can someone help me solve this dilemma?
Thank you.
 
If I understand correctly, you are creating a welded set that contains part 1 and a welded set, and the latter contains part 2 and part 3.
why don't you simply insert part 1 into the original welded assembly, obtaining a single set containing the 3 parts?
 
there are two types of joint welded processing: processing before welding and processing after welding. check that you did the work in the right place. . .
 
in fact immediately it was so, then for problems related to feasibility in production it was necessary to change the working cycle and it has gone to the solution together 1 (part 1+2) with its production code, and together 2 (axieme 1+part 3) with another code then another file.
 
Lavorazioni.webpare two identical processing environments, but the first at the top maintains the welding process, the second, if you do the processing there, when welded steps, does not consider them, indeed it is as if the "suppresses".
In fact, not by chance, they are sequential as a calculation order, one below the other.
 
It works! !

I have never considered the "preparation" command I have always used mechanical processing.

Thank you
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top