problemi cpu

[The_Matrix]

I also have a laptop with 8core and 16gb of ram at 1600mhz and 2.50 ghz processor (of m6600) and I did tests without seeing differences in modeling. But the question is... the management of computer resources who does it? can the software always do its own? or better not you want to develop software that fully exploits computer resources? How is the story?:smile::smile::smile::biggrin:

I believe that multiprocessor management can only do the operating system... Maybe I'm wrong, huh?
sin, last week I was in r&d a milford for nx8...
I met 3 "software architect"... I could ask. . .

 

[Sino]

in the .syslog file it would not seem to be trace of errors.. .

 

[cacciatorino]

I believe that multiprocessor management can only do the operating system. . .

It's usually the software that can be programmed and then compiled to exploit the parallelism of calculations, more than the host operating system.

This is common practice on fem analysis software, much less in the cad world where the bottleneck is usually the graphics card, much more than the cpu. in fact in modeling/documentation the only activities that require a strong use of cpu are the putting into the table and rendering, but it is usually a small percentage of the total time of use of the software.

I believe that a software created to use only one cpu is very difficult to make multiprocessor, and that's probably why we still suffer today the architectural choices made maybe tens of years ago in the first releases of a specific soft.

 

[IPdesign]

It's usually the software that can be programmed and then compiled to exploit the parallelism of calculations, more than the host operating system.

This is common practice on fem analysis software, much less in the cad world where the bottleneck is usually the graphics card, much more than the cpu. in fact in modeling/documentation the only activities that require a strong use of cpu are the putting into the table and rendering, but it is usually a small percentage of the total time of use of the software.

I believe that a software created to use only one cpu is very difficult to make multiprocessor, and that's probably why we still suffer today the architectural choices made maybe tens of years ago in the first releases of a specific soft.

from the top of my ignorance I had always considered the application the only element able to use the multitude of available cpus, it is proof that specific programs of rendering do this also on the same operating system that we use for nx.
then I am not an expert, maybe they throw more sessions at the same time, as for example they make acquaintances with the calculation cam nx.
Basically, to what I had to read on the net is the software that must be able to set more contemporary treads, which will then be managed by the various available cores.
a partial confirmation that nx exploits multicore with Boolean operations.
If it were seven to manage the thing, I think that regardless of what we do, we would have a load on the cpus aligned with the sofware demands.

 

[Tequila]

It's usually the software that can be programmed and then compiled to exploit the parallelism of calculations, more than the host operating system.

This is common practice on fem analysis software, much less in the cad world where the bottleneck is usually the graphics card, much more than the cpu. in fact in modeling/documentation the only activities that require a strong use of cpu are the putting into the table and rendering, but it is usually a small percentage of the total time of use of the software.

I believe that a software created to use only one cpu is very difficult to make multiprocessor, and that's probably why we still suffer today the architectural choices made maybe tens of years ago in the first releases of a specific soft.

I agree with what you say and I would add that besides the bottleneck generated by tables and rendering there is also the recalculating feature on complex models... but this has now solved it with the synchron

 

[Sino]

solved!

... updating the video drivers!

Thank you very much

 

[The_Matrix]

solved!

... updating the video drivers!

Thank you very much

Shit. . .
but how many troubles give the graphics cards!
but is it ever possible? ? ?

What graphics card do you have?
Did you put a certified driver or the last one?
Did you put the graphics card driver or the oem driver?