• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

"problemino" lamiera

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dum
  • Start date Start date

Dum

Guest
Good morning, everyone!

I'm having to convert files from another program.

I'm banging my nose on the creation of a folded sheet in which I can't replicate a stool condition.
I attach two photos:

the originalOriginale.webpwhat I can replicate:
Prova.webpsheet metal fittings in the edges of the stools can not replicate them.

I think I've tried it all before.

Does anyone have any idea how you could do that?
if there is a command between the various (split treatments etc) that can do my case?

I never used the sheet module if not for simple carter and now I went a little in cask.

for this customer I am working in sw16.

Thanks to anyone who wants to waste some time.

Have a good day! !
 
apart that, as always said, it would be better, if possible, attach the file; said this why don't you change the model received in sheet using the command insert folds?
 
hi Masses, complicated situation:

for this client I work remotely (for pdm management problems) so I managed to take me to the office only the step of both to try :)
If someone wanted to put their hands on it, I could try to recreate the original file.
but not to waste time unnecessarily I didn't.
If you want to try it, I will do it (in addition to thank you)

That said, the first road I tried was that.

but you don't recognize them, what you see is the result of step transformation.

at that point I tried to recreate it from the base flange, but the result does not change.
all the churches clearly come but remains open at that point.

I try to lighten the step, if you want to see with the functions what jumps me out there for a moment and I'll tell you.
But I don't want to abuse your time.

Thank you!
 

Attachments

I took a look.
I think you can reconstruct it only by starting from head to hand in sw.
Do you reconstruct where the file arrives and post it, from there on, see if we can help you?
 
to see so the original, that piece was not made with a sheet module but solid and then made the cuts on the folds. that piece is not reproducible in reality done that way. where there should be drains instead there is a deformation (or funnel, call it as you want)
 
I took a look.
I think you can reconstruct it only by starting from head to hand in sw.
Do you reconstruct where the file arrives and post it, from there on, see if we can help you?
Hello thanks for the answer.
I'm trying to fly the model and I'm going to run it.
Can you read the 2016 version?

Thank you for your interest!
 
Probably a printed piece.
to see so the original, that piece was not made with a sheet module but solid and then made the cuts on the folds. that piece is not reproducible in reality done that way. where there should be drains instead there is a deformation (or funnel, call it as you want)
no, created with creo sheet module.
I now lose myself in definitions, but it is the non-parametric creo (it should be modeling).

seen turning from the customer, from actually a freedom of movement that sw dreams.
with all pros and cons.

However done with the sheet module.
should form a kind of v with the rounded "wings" so that when folded these are almost to match.

but it's a condition that I can't really replicate. .
 
no, created with creo sheet module.
I now lose myself in definitions, but it is the non-parametric creo (it should be modeling).

I meant printed for workshop construction.
with the press bending machine at first sight I see it hard, seen the bent rays.
However placed the model rebuilt with the sheet module until you arrive and then see... .
 
Hello, thank you for your interest.

here the model is attached.

It's simple but I'm blocking...
 

Attachments

so closed I couldn't get it.
I did a test with 2018 at work and starting from a v-shaped sheet and then doing the upper and lower flanges manages to close more than the dum file. If it is soldered it could be acceptable.
see if I can do it again with 2014
 
or you have to stretch the sheet, make extrusions to fix the waste and then fold. in this case it would be useful to have the flattened shape made with creo.
 
I surrender. I tried in every possible manner and I didn't come to the head.
even what I said a couple of posts above, ie I had a better corner closure, is false; I probably had inserted a smaller fold radius.
 
I surrender. I tried in every possible manner and I didn't come to the head.
even what I said a couple of posts above, ie I had a better corner closure, is false; I probably had inserted a smaller fold radius.
Thank you very much for the evidence.

I'm sorry. :

I thought about it, too.
start from the development of creo and then bend. .
even if I have to chrysten a little because every program bends a little in its own way..
Maybe trying to figure out what k is set up I can get too close without having to go crazy with the fold share. .

sent by my clt-l09 using tapatalk
 
the factor k has influence on the flattening of the sheet ie on the length of the folds, not on the creation

acthung acthung... drum stamp.... .
I found an escamotage, unclean in detail, but that could be equally functional.
you spin the file in 2014
 

Attachments

the factor k has influence on the flattening of the sheet ie on the length of the folds, not on the creation

acthung acthung... drum stamp.... .
I found an escamotage, unclean in detail, but that could be equally functional.
you spin the file in 2014
Thank you! !

I can't wait to kick our eye in the morning. .
by curiosity, without losing too much time, how did you set it up?

sent by my clt-l09 using tapatalk
 
I did a small tag at the base of the radius, with an offset to enter the fold, and then with the bride (set method) I closed the edges. cutting is necessary because otherwise only with the offset you have an anomaly of the material.
this generates a protrusion (which perhaps in the image is understood) but in the order of 1mm that you can safely clean in production.
pictures in order:
final result
final result in which you notice the protrusion
cut with offset at the base of the radius
face offsett
flat sheet
 

Attachments

  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    6.6 KB · Views: 8
  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    5.5 KB · Views: 8
  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    13.4 KB · Views: 7
  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    69.2 KB · Views: 7
  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    8.9 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
Thank you very much for the fight.
I'll throw an eye tomorrow, you saved my cul... face with the client. :

Beer paid. :

sent by my clt-l09 using tapatalk
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top