problems together

[blubossa]

Hi.
I have two problems together that I can't understand:
What does that mean?
- in a set I assembled a part with the bond that can translate 300 mm. and so far everything works well, but when I go to insert this together in another together the translation does not work anymore despite I did not give as reference in the constraints of assembly the translating part.

help me understand why?

Thank you.
bb

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

for the ? see http://help.solidworks.com/2015/ita.../c_featuremanager_design_tree_conventions.htmfor the other problem you have to put the subaxieme as flexible. flexible axieme propertiesView attachment 41753

 

[blubossa]

for the ? see http://help.solidworks.com/2015/ita.../c_featuremanager_design_tree_conventions.htmfor the other problem you have to put the subaxieme as flexible. flexible axieme propertiesView attachment 41753

thanks massive,
in the afternoon when I will be able to use real sw

bb

 

[blubossa]

thanks massive,
in the afternoon when I will be able to use real sw

bb

Thanks, it works perfectly.....I lost some time to find the icon but there is I made it.....:finger:

 

[leggera]

but is it normal that the aid made flexible precisely because it needs references from other assemblies parts if reopened individually not affected by new positions?
for example I have a set to and a b.. b needs a for references. I make it flexible, but I read it all b I remain as I created it and not as I adapted it up to ?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I don't remember how he behaves, but it doesn't seem strange that they are two independent positions.
Moreover, the flexibility of a set is precisely because the position of the aforementioned assembly is not handed down to the aid in which it is contained.
I think it's different if there are relationships between the two files; in practice if the geometry or position of the axieme b is related to the axieme to a dimensional reference, sketch or similar (so in the axieme b you will find the symbol > indicating a relationship). matings are obviously not part of the references.

 

[leggera]

I think it's strange that he didn't take that very useful function. I look better tomorrow, maybe I put an example of what I want.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

This is not a function, at most you could define it as an option that keeps the part equal to its state in the axieme.
It seems to me not a lack, that I do not think so, so serious.

 

[drake]

here on the forum I often read about things so strange that sincerely to me seem strange the things defined strangely... :
never happened that sw changed the position of a component that is really not bound to others. only recently with sw 2017 made me a strange thing with parts created with references in other parts within the axieme. It's the first time I got a similar pb. I'm sure it depends on the updates of wins and that the old versions could sometimes go into crisis, so much so that it also crashed me a couple of times with that job.